Christophe wrote:
I do not agree ... for me it is the "ideal" house (in theory because there is no such thing as the ideal house) that would be a fair compromise between passive house and bioclimatic house.
The heating of a passive house is carried out ... by the inhabitants and internal losses. This is why we rarely see compact fluorescent bulbs in passive houses ... and that the electrical cost (VMC in particular) is rarely put forward ...
Is there a post for the electrical consumption of passive houses on econology?
No?
So, you have to make one (see ... for or against passive houses)