sicetaitsimple wrote:Ahmed wrote:This is just another way of saying the same thing ...
No, no, let's be serious! You wrote (without writing it) that the coefficient went from 2,58 to 1, while it would go (to my knowledge, the RT2020 is still just a project) from 2,58 to 2,3.
+1
What to choose therefore had to tangle brushes!
On the other hand, for CO2 actually the value of 79 g / kWh retained seems small ... and especially the huge difference ... reduction of more than 60% ...