mariepoussin wrote:In fact, we had launched a procedure following many advice from you on the forum in 2012 (what recourse to boiler oversizing?).
Most of the speakers were rather against it, I remember.
mariepoussin wrote:I understood that it was better to undersize this type of device for optimal operation.
The main heating is not undersized.
mariepoussin wrote:So I understand that it will be difficult to highlight a possible over-sizing?
Yes and no. A heating contractor has an obligation of result. Finding out after the fact is legally sufficient.
Regulation will necessarily go through a balloon and thermostatic valves to be effective.mariepoussin wrote:For the moment the expert highlights:
- inadequate regulation constitutes an error in the design / construction of the installation with a clearly negative impact on the comfort of the accommodation,
yes, this is professional misconduct.mariepoussin wrote:- the absence of air supply constitutes an error in the realization of the installation likely to generate combustion faults,
little game, in Germany and Italy it's just the opposite. it is discussed.mariepoussin wrote:- the interlocking of the inverted connection pipe constitutes a production error,
No. Only the result counts. If the fumes are evacuated properly you can not fault anything, and with 125 I am sure there is no problem for this stove. Maybe even too much draft, hence the noise?mariepoussin wrote:- smoke pipe in diameter 125 instead of 150 recommended by the manufacturer, this non-compliance constitutes an installation error,
I am surprised by the sound level, Thermorossi is generally rather discreetmariepoussin wrote:- the sound intensity of the stove located under the master bedroom constitutes an installation error or at least a provision contrary to common sense,
easy to arrange, and moreover it is discussed.mariepoussin wrote:- the position of the thermostat located in the most wasteful room constitutes an installation error,
yes but are you sure there is no balancing tee?mariepoussin wrote:- the absence of balancing constitutes a design error.
There were big disparities in the size of the radiators compared to the volumes, especially in the baby's room. I had advised you to contact the ademe or its equivalent to make you subsidize the thermal diagnosis and to put a balloon and thermostatic valves.
In the stove manual it is clearly stated: "Installation without an accumulator tank is possible under certain conditions but not recommended for ease of use."
and also: "In the absence of an accumulator: installation of thermostatic valves on radiators prohibited, radiator diffusion power greater than the minimum boiler power, connection to a heated floor prohibited".
So your heating engineer is deemed to have known what he was doing.
What you can get from a court is the establishment of an effective regulation, with ball and thermostatic valves.