Hello,
For 2-3 days my average cycle time has dropped so that I end up with durations of about twenty minutes.
So it's true, the t ° are milder at the moment, does that have a relationship? What adjustments can I make to find acceptable times between 45mn and 60mn like when it is colder?
Another thing that may be symptomatic: I am forced to send a lower setpoint via my interior sensor because otherwise we reach 21 ° in automatic mode.
For this I correct the water law as and when (1 setting / day)
as follows: If T ° ext> 5 then increase the water law by 0,2 and lower the fixed foot by 5 °
Today I have: water law at 1,8 and curve foot at 30 °
I no longer want to lower the fixed base because otherwise my radiators (steel, no heated floor) may no longer heat up for once
Ah and finally, I change the DHW priority alternately from one day to the next from OFF to ON to see if it influences the average time ....
In short I am a little lost there on the settings. I no longer know on which parameter I can play now .....
Help me please
Thanks for reading me
@+
Okofen, mean cycle time (P114) in free fall
With me too, the cycles are also shorter with warming. Normal.
For my steel radiators, I am at a fixed Pt 28 ° and a curve at 0,8.
Try to lower your slope.
In addition, with a hysteresis at 1 and a set point at 19 ° 5 you should not exceed 20 ° 5 because the circulator stops.
JC
For my steel radiators, I am at a fixed Pt 28 ° and a curve at 0,8.
Try to lower your slope.
In addition, with a hysteresis at 1 and a set point at 19 ° 5 you should not exceed 20 ° 5 because the circulator stops.
JC
0 x
Continually trying we finally succeed. So more it fails, the more likely it is that it works.
Re: Okofen, average cycle time (P114) in free fall
sebsebien wrote:
as follows: If T ° ext> 5 then increase the water law by 0,2 and lower the fixed foot by 5 °
Today I have: water law at 1,8 and curve foot at 30 °
I no longer want to lower the fixed foot because otherwise my radiators (steel, no heated floor) may no longer heat up for once: frown:
@+
You can adjust more finely, lowering your foot from degree to degree. Likewise, the slope adjusts by 0,1 (from memory, correct me if I'm wrong). I don't know why it's written like that in the method. At first, to "approach" the balance OK. But afterwards, we can play finer.
Indeed, if you drop from 30 to 25, it may be too much. But from 30 to 28 °, you can try.
And leave the slope a little. You will see if it "holds" when it is very cold. Otherwise, you will put together a chouilla (by 0,1) ...
Or on the contrary, if the temperature will tend to go up too much when it is very cold, that would mean that your slope is a little steep and the regulates it a little too much.
0 x
finding long cycles at any cost is a mistake, what is necessary is to avoid short cycles when temperatures are low, which is a sign of incorrect configuration or sizing.
having short cycles in mild weather is normal.
moreover, finding the right water balance is really difficult when the outside temperatures change too much from one day to another and in addition, we try a new setting per day. it is better to put the V3V in manual and "garner" measures: departure temp, ext temp. and actual interior temp obtained.
with only 4 or 5 measurement points, provided that the outside temperatures have been sufficiently different, we can determine by calculation THE exact water law.
having short cycles in mild weather is normal.
moreover, finding the right water balance is really difficult when the outside temperatures change too much from one day to another and in addition, we try a new setting per day. it is better to put the V3V in manual and "garner" measures: departure temp, ext temp. and actual interior temp obtained.
with only 4 or 5 measurement points, provided that the outside temperatures have been sufficiently different, we can determine by calculation THE exact water law.
0 x
Of course I know this tool!
the proof here: https://www.econologie.com/fichiers/partager2/1265751979UbxQzC.xls
but I don't know if I'm using it properly
I compile the temperatures but over several days because it is difficult to obtain the most opposite temperatures possible within the same day.
Am I doing well or is it useless?
the proof here: https://www.econologie.com/fichiers/partager2/1265751979UbxQzC.xls
but I don't know if I'm using it properly
I compile the temperatures but over several days because it is difficult to obtain the most opposite temperatures possible within the same day.
Am I doing well or is it useless?
0 x
The higher the outside temperatures. the more distant, the steeper the curve to be fair. During the same day, it is difficult.
Patience.
I seem to have read: "with a pellet boiler, the first year, we observe, the second we try to regulate, the third, we save money ..."
It is also true that with this forum, it's faster.
JC
Patience.
I seem to have read: "with a pellet boiler, the first year, we observe, the second we try to regulate, the third, we save money ..."
It is also true that with this forum, it's faster.
JC
0 x
Continually trying we finally succeed. So more it fails, the more likely it is that it works.
one measure per day is sufficient.
what I had done personally, c'et that the days when I was at home all day (the WE) if the outside temperature was "interesting" compared to the points that I already had, I put the V3V in manu to be sure to have a stable departure temp and after 3 or 4 hours, I noted the ambient temperature obtained (+ departure temp + ext. temp.)
then I would put the V3V back in auto until the next WE or I would have the opportunity to take a measurement.
with 4 or 5 ext temp values between -5 and 5 °, it is good to define a line.
On the other hand, I find the time to redo my table to take account of ambient temperatures different from 20 ° because for the moment we have to calculate the curve offset.
what I had done personally, c'et that the days when I was at home all day (the WE) if the outside temperature was "interesting" compared to the points that I already had, I put the V3V in manu to be sure to have a stable departure temp and after 3 or 4 hours, I noted the ambient temperature obtained (+ departure temp + ext. temp.)
then I would put the V3V back in auto until the next WE or I would have the opportunity to take a measurement.
with 4 or 5 ext temp values between -5 and 5 °, it is good to define a line.
On the other hand, I find the time to redo my table to take account of ambient temperatures different from 20 ° because for the moment we have to calculate the curve offset.
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 8 Replies
- 7514 views
-
Last message by loloetalex
View the latest post
11/12/21, 11:46A subject posted in the forum : Heating, insulation, ventilation, VMC, cooling ...
-
- 27 Replies
- 25380 views
-
Last message by roy1361
View the latest post
19/08/11, 22:18A subject posted in the forum : Heating, insulation, ventilation, VMC, cooling ...
-
- 12 Replies
- 13842 views
-
Last message by Bert_Rand
View the latest post
07/10/23, 16:58A subject posted in the forum : Heating, insulation, ventilation, VMC, cooling ...
-
- 114 Replies
- 75308 views
-
Last message by dhaulagiri
View the latest post
23/02/11, 14:58A subject posted in the forum : Heating, insulation, ventilation, VMC, cooling ...
Back to "Heating, insulation, ventilation, VMC, cooling ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 494 guests