A government amendment in the Grenelle 2 bill proposes to simply abolish the public inquiry procedure for all requests to increase radioactive and chemical discharges and water withdrawals from nuclear installations.
http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/ta ... 449-a0.asp
Article 94c
(Unchanged)
After the II of article 29 of the law n ° 2006-686 of June 13, 2006 relating to the transparency and the security in nuclear matter, a II bis is inserted as follows:
"IIa. - A project to modify the installation or its operating conditions subject to the agreement of the Nuclear Safety Authority which, without constituting a significant modification to the installation, is likely to cause a significant increase in its withdrawals of water or its discharges into the environment is made available to the public according to the methods defined in article L. 122-1-1 of the environment code. "
http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/ta ... 449-a0.asp
http://www.sortirdunucleaire.org/index. ... age=index#
If this amendment were voted, a simple administrative authorization would suffice to increase polluting and toxic discharges and withdrawals from the aquatic resource instead of a restrictive and lengthy procedure today: the public inquiry.
this amendment would trivialize nuclear pollution. It would constitute a veritable blank check given to the nuclear industry to discreetly increase damage to the environment and living beings, pollution of natural environments and the endangerment of the biodiversity of aquatic environments.
In both cases, it is therefore a question of giving priority to the profitability of nuclear installations to the detriment of the health of populations and the protection of the environment.
The fact that this amendment is part of the Grenelle 2 bill shows that the French executive has moved from the stage of the green electoral promise to the total regression of environmental law. Since the Grenelle announcement, the executive has unilaterally announced the construction of two nuclear reactors, while the development of wind energy will be hampered by the recommendations of the Ollier report. It is now a question of significantly reducing the regulatory constraint in order to grant the nuclear industry a right to contaminate the environment and humans.
This amendment confirms once again that the "Grenelle de l'Environnement" favors the interests of the nuclear industry, in complete contradiction with the declared ecological ambitions.
Only effective reaction, to inform, to protest against hypocrisy repeatedly and to insist with our respective deputies and senators whatever their political position !!
For Xynthia, danger of death over 200 years, we demolish, but for nuclear power cannot be infallible over 100 years, because no man is infallible, we will have a Chernobyl in France sooner or later, with certainty, with evacuation of an entire region in one night to never, return there for centuries and centuries, (uncultivable, uninhabitable!) and therefore saw the danger of death unless 100Km from a nuclear power plant houses must be destroyed preventively as for Xynthia and moved before the safe and certain disaster over 100 years !!!
What do you do during such a disaster?
I leave at 90 ° without believing, the soothing lies either towards my other second home at 900Km, or I leave France by recovering all my money, if possible, considering the million who will do the same !!
Send this kind of real concern to your MPs, far superior to a flood behind poorly maintained dikes, ithis is a badly controlled nuclear power plant, sooner or later !!