izentrop wrote:I should have specified: "serious professional"Any professional ...
Holds, a new Séralini http://alerte-environnement.fr/2019/11/ ... inisation/
Here, more ...
http://alertepesticideshautegironde.fr/ ... esticides/
izentrop wrote:I should have specified: "serious professional"Any professional ...
Holds, a new Séralini http://alerte-environnement.fr/2019/11/ ... inisation/
It is heavy indeed. Already the author does not sign his article.GuyGadebois wrote:Here, more ...
http://alertepesticideshautegironde.fr/ ... esticides/
Yeah it's clearoncologist Catherine Hill, whom we heard on France Culture last September "why legislate [on the spraying distance] when 30% of the population is allowed to smoke?"
Here then ! it is however the scientific consensusHervé This who writes in an article trying to show that most pesticides are natural “In toxicology, the first rule is that everything is poisonous and that it is the dose that makes something not poisonous”, which is a total untruth.
A nice bunch of activists not clear with scienceElise Lucet (Cash Investigation), Stéphane Foucart (Le Monde) but also scientists like Gilles-Eric Seralini, Pierre Rustin, Dominique Belpomme, association managers like François Veillerette, Corinne Lepage, elected officials like the mayor of Langouët Daniel Cueff or Senator Joël Labbé.
izentrop wrote:Here then ! it is however the scientific consensusGuyGadebois wrote:“In toxicology, the first rule is that everything is poisonous and that it is the dose that makes something not poisonous”, which is a total untruth.
izentrop wrote: It is heavy indeed. Already the author does not sign his article.
The experts analyzed the data from the evaluation dossiers for active substances within the framework of European regulations and the data relating to the risks to human health associated with each use of the products, the toxicity to mammals and the carcinogenicity, whatever the pathways or mechanisms of action that could be responsible for this toxicity (genotoxicity, epigenetics, mitotoxicity, etc.).
Data from scientific literature and international databases, surveillance data (contamination of environments and food in particular), vigilance and control were also studied by the ANSES group of experts.
All of this work does not provide any evidence in favor of the existence of an alert for human health and the environment related to the agricultural uses of these fungicides which could justify the modification or withdrawal of authorizations. of placing on the market.
Indeed, the level of total dietary exposure compared to the currently established toxicological thresholds is low and the exceedances of maximum residue limits for these active substances are exceptional. Moreover, these substances are rapidly metabolized and eliminated. Finally, with regard to the sources consulted, no data has been identified suggesting an increase in the incidence of specific cancers associated with SDH deficiency in humans without a mutation (in exposed professionals, for example), despite the sometimes long-standing commercialization of these SDHI molecules, or of data suggesting an impact for environmental organisms. https://www.anses.fr/fr/content/fongici ... sultats-de
izentrop wrote:It is missed for glyphosate, the new whooping cough of "poppies" is still rejected before the experts. What a bunch of brain feats anyway.
That is to say ?plasmanu wrote:Hummingbirds are prohibited in France
And there are no hummingbirds in mainland France, not yet that I know of, but there are indeed in Yellowstone.
Banned because it would be an invasive and non-native species
Back to "Garden: landscaping, plants, garden, ponds and pools"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 135 guests