I do not speak of a multitude, but about twenty; in what way would a height comparable to that of towers be delirious?
The first reason is that to provide a sufficient amount, it would take such a multitude of small installations (as a reminder a 12 kw / h is still 6m height and it is a big piece in the garden or on the roof !) unsightly and even worse compared to wind turbines which, according to some, deteriorate the landscape, that it is hardly possible. The second is that on the industrial side, only sector can afford very large machines, and as said before, they are equipped with technicians, lawyers to take all the necessary precautions to avoid a circle.
On the other hand, I do not seek to demonstrate a practical possibility, but to underline the principled absurdity of this device so simple and that would have escaped however a string of scientists and technicians who spend their time to develop machines otherwise elaborated , governed by equations of a rigorous constancy and always checked.
It may be where the ball hurts. Indeed (and there I do not credit or discredit anything) many professionals lock themselves on their certainties of knowledge. The number of possible protesters is as numerous as the protesters of the impossible and the examples are sufficient: Tesla, Clem, Brown, Pantone, (AIDS), etc ... see the list on Quanthomme with certainly possible as impossible ostensibly.
Recently, on another forum, another process was discussed and one of the spokespersons of this project was able to speak, unfortunately, this was only to invoke technical secrecy and be content to question those who dared to express their doubts about the validity of the claims of the "inventors".
For the technical secret, it is the rule in the industrial environment to avoid the copies, Asian way or not, and to drown the commercial environment with bad copies not respectful of the patent (or intellectual protection filed) and thus defalibrating the initial product.
As for the claims, " we recognize a tree with its fruits "Clearly the product is functional or it is not, it's simple as hello and I doubt that Webmen's went to see and control on the spot.
This shows especially that those who discuss these forums are not direct experimenters but discussants on the sex of angels.
Very wisely, the thread was closed until details about this smoky project can be used.
In general, the threads are closed not because of a subject that would drag in length but because it degenerates into rudeness vis-à-vis other stakeholders. What all forum consider as a reason for closure or exclusion.