Wind power: for or against the wind?

Renewable energies except solar electric or thermal (seeforums dedicated below): wind turbines, energy from the sea, hydraulic and hydroelectricity, biomass, biogas, deep geothermal energy ...
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by Exnihiloest » 07/06/21, 19:42

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:Nuclear power only exists because we have subsidized it, tidal power and geothermal energy as well. Something else ?

The observation is that nuclear power, even subsidized which remains to be demonstrated given the very long return on investment, provides electricity much cheaper than wind power.
The rest is religious ideology.

Source for the closure of wind farms in the USA?
https://batinfo.com/actualite/leolien-e ... -usa_14943

"renewable-electricity-the-most-produced-in-2019" HS, I won't even see the link. The fact that it is the most produced shows only one thing: the others are even more null.

Example of closure, Oklahoma, worse, we let rot in place:


In Hawaii:
Image
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14821
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4301

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 07/06/21, 20:27

Bias information, see disinformation. Explanations (But you don't care since you don't click on the links we post .... infused science):
https://translate.google.com/translate? ... s-litte%2F
Wind power in Oklahoma:
https://translate.google.com/translate? ... n_Oklahoma
Wind power in Hawaii:
https://translate.google.com/translate? ... _in_Hawaii
Your photo is an outdated 2012 Daily Mail "Nothing" article. : Mrgreen:
So your videos showing old wind turbines over thirty years old, eh ... after that we can certainly find fault with the dismantling of these sites and the recycling of what can be.

* the Kamaoa wind farm was 27 years old in 2012 ...
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by Exnihiloest » 07/06/21, 21:48

The ecologists, who cry loudly for a yes or a no when it comes to nuclear or coal-fired power plants, we no longer hear them when their friends in the green industry leave wind turbines to rot in nature.
Funny this denial of the pollution they create.
This is undoubtedly because their pollution is "sustainable", the buzzword of their movement.

Come on, let's get over one:
Image

How beautiful, the results of ecologism!

"Tens of thousands of aging blades descend from steel towers around the world and most have nowhere to go except landfills. In the United States alone, approximately 8 will be phased out over the next four years. According to BloombergNEF, in Europe, which has been dealing with the problem for longer, around 000 blades / year will be decommissioned until at least 3. The situation will therefore worsen: most were built more than ten years ago, when the installations were less than a fifth of what they are today.
Designed to withstand hurricane force winds, the blades cannot easily be crushed, recycled or reused. This has created an urgent search for alternatives in places that lack open grasslands. In the United States, they are dumped with a shovel in the landfills that accept them, in Lake Mills, Iowa; Sioux Falls, South Dakota; and Casper, where they will be buried, up to 10 meters deep, stacked on top of each other.
“At the end of the day, the blades of wind turbines are here forever,” said Bob Cappadona, Chief Operating Officer
of the North American unit of Veolia Environnement SA based in Paris, which is looking for better ways to manage massive waste. “Most of the landfills are considered dry graves
. "
https://augustinmassin.blogspot.com/202 ... ne-se.html
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by Exnihiloest » 07/06/21, 21:51

0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14821
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4301

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 07/06/21, 21:58

Blame environmentalists on the fact that those responsible / operators of wind power do not want to recycle their waste? I dreamed about it, Tryphon does it. And he dares to talk about tartufferie!

Truth Energy (The authors of the sham video):
Who is Truth Energy?
We are a collective of experts and actors from various economic and political backgrounds, eager to participate in the debate on energy in France and to demystify certain received ideas.
We consider that it is time to give the floor to those who know technically and economically the subject of energy.

Ultra politicized tartuffes (From the Catholic right, of course) .... who claim to be experts. "Experts without diplomas", a bit like the 500 assholes signatories of the false manifesto for the climate ... : Mrgreen:
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by Exnihiloest » 07/06/21, 22:17

Not even screwed up for assuming your ideological absurdities, the green people. But what a bunch of false chips!
They call for "renewable" energies, overpriced bullshit if recycling had to be planned from the start and they know it well, and when they are put in place and pollute, our ecologists refuse to assume the consequences of their acts.
It is sustainable or even renewable balls that they would need!
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14821
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4301

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 07/06/21, 22:21

Blah blah of a licensed liar. The fact that nothing would be recyclable (which is totally false, moreover) is not the fault of environmentalists but of the public authorities and the industrialists who build them and who make their money with them. Meditate on it, it could not be more true. As for your "balls", it is highly unlikely that you have owned even the shadow of half of one. : Mrgreen:
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by izentrop » 10/06/21, 01:08

Do you still rely on wind turbines to create jobs in France? This documentary is made for you: https://eoliennes-lefilm.com/

0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14821
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4301

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 10/06/21, 01:26

Image
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by izentrop » 10/06/21, 01:48

Think a little and look at the reality of the facts, instead of your usual skin reactions dictated by your anthroposophical education.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 208 guests