Wind power: for or against the wind?

Renewable energies except solar electric or thermal (seeforums dedicated below): wind turbines, energy from the sea, hydraulic and hydroelectricity, biomass, biogas, deep geothermal energy ...
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14953
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4359

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 03/06/21, 21:38

Exnihiloest wrote:Putting people down is the biggest environmental dream.

Well let's see, still in full fantasy ... we will talk about it again in 20 or 30 years, when nuclear will be obsolete (We are already buying Chinese tech because we are not screwed to make the EPR work) and that we will have this crap to dismantle or worse, when we have a Chernobyl back home ...
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by Exnihiloest » 03/06/21, 22:13

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:
Exnihiloest wrote:Putting people down is the biggest environmental dream.

Well let's see, still in full fantasy ... we will talk about it again in 20 or 30 years, when nuclear will be obsolete (We are already buying Chinese tech because we are not screwed to make the EPR work) and that we will have this crap to dismantle or worse, when we have a Chernobyl back home ...

I'm not sure we can talk about it. Will there still be power?
If the environmental movement goes global, we will have to study communication by smoke signals.
Smoke? Uh, no, I didn't say anything, it's fine particles. Not allowed !
We will therefore communicate by letters and porters on horseback, if we still have the right to take Nature to make paper, and if the equestrian animal condition has a status still compatible with the transport of man.
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14953
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4359

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 03/06/21, 22:14

(No need to respond to a mentally ill slave to his fantasies ...)
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by Exnihiloest » 04/06/21, 18:57

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:(No need to respond to a mentally ill slave to his fantasies ...)

It would take wit for that.
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14953
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4359

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 04/06/21, 18:59

Talk about what we don't have ...? Yes, of course, this is proof of a deranged mind. Please confirm your madness.
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by Exnihiloest » 04/06/21, 19:34

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:Talk about what we don't have ...? Yes, of course, this is proof of a deranged mind. Please confirm your madness.

and you your stupidity as filthy as it is vindictive.
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by Exnihiloest » 05/06/21, 21:22

sicetaitsimple wrote:
Exnihiloest wrote:As a reminder, the accounts for 2020 of the Beatrice wind farm in the North Sea:
Energy sale: £ 92,2 million
Renewable MWh grant: £ 281,3 million
Operating expenses: £ 127,4 million


Source? I am still surprised by the number of what you call "operating expenses"?

Sorry for my late response, I must have skipped yours.
The accounts are there:
https://find-and-update.company-informa ... ng-history

Article:
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpre ... last-year/
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14953
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4359

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 05/06/21, 21:37

AHAHAHAHAHAHAH! After the manifesto of the 500 crooks, the sweetie comes to take another jerk off his sleeve ...
An old c .. outdated which quotes another old c .. retired, here is Tryphon in all his splendor ...
"not a lot of peaople know that" is a blog by Paul Homewood, an incompetent without competence ...
(Translated)
According to Bob Ward, director of policy and communications at the London School of Economics' Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, Homewood has "no professional qualifications or training in meteorology or climate."

Paul Homewood is a retired accountant and climate blogger who has written on climate and energy issues since 2011, according to a report by the UK's largest denial group, the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF).

In addition to posting almost daily blog posts, Homewood is a regular contributor to The Conservative Woman, a conservative blog launched in 2014 as a "counter-cultural offensive against the forces of leftism, feminism and modernism."

Read this, it's edifying:
https://translate.google.com/translate? ... omewood%2F
Look at me this face:
Tèt'eud'cul.JPG
Tèt'eud'cul.JPG (16.93 KiB) Viewed 1058 times
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9830
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2672

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by sicetaitsimple » 06/06/21, 13:00

Exnihiloest wrote:
sicetaitsimple wrote:
Exnihiloest wrote:As a reminder, the accounts for 2020 of the Beatrice wind farm in the North Sea:
Energy sale: £ 92,2 million
Renewable MWh grant: £ 281,3 million
Operating expenses: £ 127,4 million


Source? I am still surprised by the number of what you call "operating expenses"?

Sorry for my late response, I must have skipped yours.
The accounts are there:
https://find-and-update.company-informa ... ng-history

Article:
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpre ... last-year/


I was "right" to be "surprised" by the figure which seemed enormous to me ... The "operating expenses" as defined include depreciation:

"Operating and other expenses, excluding depreciation of £ 89 million, total £ 62 million or £ 26 / MWh."

This explains that.
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Wind: for or against the wind?




by Exnihiloest » 06/06/21, 19:23

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:...
Read this, it's edifying:
https://translate.google.com/translate? ... omewood%2F
Look at me this face:
Image
Tèt'eud'cul.JPG

This is not the first time that GuyGadebois has used the crime of facies. Beaufritude in all its "splendor"
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 333 guests