by Did67 » 04/07/13, 08:16
Just to argue. Not to contradict.
a) I would be more nuanced on EELV. It is not a homogeneous movement. So there is a bit of everything. In addition, at local levels (town hall, Regional Councils), there have been interesting actions, often passed unnoticed. Here an incinerator which has not been set up, but the selective sorting and weighted instead, etc ...
Let us nuance our thoughts, they will only tighten them more!
b) I fear that if the green "ideas" were imposed more, it could only be through a "coup"!
Let's not forget, guys, that we are a band of ultra-minority Huluberlus in the country!
If our ideas were imposed like that, it would be a "putsch"!
What the vast majority of French people want is cheap electricity, a dropping price of scraburants, "pretty" and "comfortable" cars, a single-family house ... salt pans which go up to consume more.
We shouldn't blame EELV for failing to change that with a snap of the fingers!
How many readers on this forum ? For 65 million French people and I don't know how many Belgians, Swiss and other French speakers?
c) On the participation of "greens" in government, I am still thinking of Germany. There, the "grünen" swallowed the grapes of the time of the red-green coalition (SPD-Grünen). And yet, today, on energy issues, we see the shock wave: exit from nuclear power, leader in PV, leader in biogas ...
I am one of those who thinks that we have to do "entryism". I made some. We leave feathers there. You have to have enormous resilience ... but it is better to have 5% reasons with everyone than 100% alone!
That's just my opinion. And my previous choices ...
[I am far from being an EELV activist or member; that was not my commitment]
0 x