The small arrangement between neighbor, we've already talked about ... on the subject of solar PV.
It will work but not long because the fraud will be quickly spotted (data recouping with other facilities in the region) and the financial risk is very important in case of breaking the contract ...
In addition it is subsidy theft ...
Injecting current on the contract without network?
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79121
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10973
@ Hello
well if you want, it makes me laugh to read your tricks ...
EDF will not take long to see your pirate cables and your production or consumption abnormal.
As for pleading with insurers in the event of a claim, don't even think about it... already we generally lose by being in the right, when we are all at fault...
And as long as the lawsuit lasts, no funds are unblocked, except those in your wallet to pay a lawyer tie.
@+
well if you want, it makes me laugh to read your tricks ...
EDF will not take long to see your pirate cables and your production or consumption abnormal.
As for pleading with insurers in the event of a claim, don't even think about it... already we generally lose by being in the right, when we are all at fault...
And as long as the lawsuit lasts, no funds are unblocked, except those in your wallet to pay a lawyer tie.
@+
0 x
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
do not talk about fire the main circuit breaker imposed by the edf is the cut it with the same current that it is the nuclear power station that pushes it or the small gegene of the corner: so there will be no fire on the public circuit has cuse of this injection
If there is fire at home it is your instalation: the insurance imposes to respect the standards in force, surtou or for the heating apparatus, but it does not prohibit to possess other apparatus
the insurance does not prohibit to place apparatus for which there is not even a standard!
If there is fire at home it is your instalation: the insurance imposes to respect the standards in force, surtou or for the heating apparatus, but it does not prohibit to possess other apparatus
the insurance does not prohibit to place apparatus for which there is not even a standard!
0 x
- coucou789456
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 1019
- Registration: 22/08/08, 05:15
- Location: Narbonne
Good evening
when you see some EDF meter installations, in old buildings, with connection wires flying, one wonders if it is controlled and who can recognize a compliant installation, at least not by a consuel.
I have made only one hypothesis, but I am sure that some who have the fiber of honesty well weakened must not be left behind.
but by continuing, to fill its PV production by wind, it must not enter the contract either.
jeff
a slobber because as magistrates, clerks, chief clerks, lawyers, all have a white bib. then the rest of the dress indicates the profession and the level reached (at least it was noticed before thanks to significant differences)a lawyer tie.
when you see some EDF meter installations, in old buildings, with connection wires flying, one wonders if it is controlled and who can recognize a compliant installation, at least not by a consuel.
I have made only one hypothesis, but I am sure that some who have the fiber of honesty well weakened must not be left behind.
but by continuing, to fill its PV production by wind, it must not enter the contract either.
jeff
0 x
when you see some EDF meter installations, in old buildings, with connection wires flying, one wonders if it is controlled and who can recognize a compliant installation, at least not by a consuel.
Just for the anecdote: there is worse!
https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... 3J0xIr.JPG
https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... 2qFuoz.JPG
https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... cTGkA1.JPG
0 x
Hello
still an idea ... propagated by artisans or insurers.
an unaltered 1940 install is in the norms since there was no standard in 40.
the individual who is not lessor has no obligation to comply with current standards otherwise it will change are instal all 2 years.
moreover it is not pro and is not held (unlike the industrial and tertiary) to make verif and repair are instal.
and even when selling the diagnosis elec does not look much apart from the earth and the value of the fuses or circuit breakers, more c it is just for info since there is no obligation to repair.
for the insurers who in their contract subscription questionnaire ask the customer if his installation is up to standard, this has no value and does not engage the customer who is not professional and who is not supposed to know the standards.
if this was an excuse for non-reimbursement for insurers then they would never repay ..
the insurance imposes to respect the norms in force
still an idea ... propagated by artisans or insurers.
an unaltered 1940 install is in the norms since there was no standard in 40.
the individual who is not lessor has no obligation to comply with current standards otherwise it will change are instal all 2 years.
moreover it is not pro and is not held (unlike the industrial and tertiary) to make verif and repair are instal.
and even when selling the diagnosis elec does not look much apart from the earth and the value of the fuses or circuit breakers, more c it is just for info since there is no obligation to repair.
for the insurers who in their contract subscription questionnaire ask the customer if his installation is up to standard, this has no value and does not engage the customer who is not professional and who is not supposed to know the standards.
if this was an excuse for non-reimbursement for insurers then they would never repay ..
0 x
moreover a norm is not a law ...
at least 50% of the contract clauses are illegal.
in doing so, the insurer hopes that the underwriter will respect these clauses in order to minimize the risk of loss for itself.
I even have an auto insurance contract in which there is a clause like "loan of the vehicle to a young driver prohibited" and a little further there: "amount of the deductible if vehicle driven by a young driver".
it was for the anecdote, but in all the contracts there are about ten of this kind.
there is still more idea about auto insurance.
the pb c is that to know all this it is necessary either know an expert or deal with insurers ... not cool ... but we learn a little more about these professional hustlers who only respects the insurance code and rarely the law.
at least 50% of the contract clauses are illegal.
in doing so, the insurer hopes that the underwriter will respect these clauses in order to minimize the risk of loss for itself.
I even have an auto insurance contract in which there is a clause like "loan of the vehicle to a young driver prohibited" and a little further there: "amount of the deductible if vehicle driven by a young driver".
it was for the anecdote, but in all the contracts there are about ten of this kind.
there is still more idea about auto insurance.
the pb c is that to know all this it is necessary either know an expert or deal with insurers ... not cool ... but we learn a little more about these professional hustlers who only respects the insurance code and rarely the law.
0 x
- Former Oceano
- Moderator
- posts: 1571
- Registration: 04/06/05, 23:10
- Location: Lorraine - France
- x 1
For auto insurance, we must not forget that "the insurance code is not opposable to the highway code".
If a car you grid priority, made a maneuver in front of you and you get into it without being able to do anything, insurance say '100% of your fault (not master of the vehicle)' or '50 / 50'.
When we start telling them the magic phrase by giving them the factual elements of the offenses committed by the other vehicle, they make the mouth but we come out with a 100% on the other.
However, they point out that this will be noted in the record even if the bonus is kept, but we do not care, unless we have fun changing insurance regularly ...
In other cases we come back to the same situations. When a civil code, town planning or other legally defined items and that these are treated differently by insurance must refer to the corresponding legal codes.
If a car you grid priority, made a maneuver in front of you and you get into it without being able to do anything, insurance say '100% of your fault (not master of the vehicle)' or '50 / 50'.
When we start telling them the magic phrase by giving them the factual elements of the offenses committed by the other vehicle, they make the mouth but we come out with a 100% on the other.
However, they point out that this will be noted in the record even if the bonus is kept, but we do not care, unless we have fun changing insurance regularly ...
In other cases we come back to the same situations. When a civil code, town planning or other legally defined items and that these are treated differently by insurance must refer to the corresponding legal codes.
0 x
[MODO Mode = ON]
Zieuter but do not think less ...
Peugeot Ion (VE), KIA Optime PHEV, VAE, no electric motorcycle yet...
Zieuter but do not think less ...
Peugeot Ion (VE), KIA Optime PHEV, VAE, no electric motorcycle yet...
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
Chatelot 16 wrote:
Let's refocus the debate: European states are obliged to have their country produce a certain percentage of green electricity. Some states (including France, Belgium) pass on this obligation to electricity suppliers. The system of green certificates is the result of this obligation. This buy-in at time-premium is a way for electricity providers to pay for your investment instead of investing on their own.
I would prefer that everyone gets a few 100 w of photovoltaics and sells at a normal price, rather than some do big instalation and sell at a subsidized price
Let's refocus the debate: European states are obliged to have their country produce a certain percentage of green electricity. Some states (including France, Belgium) pass on this obligation to electricity suppliers. The system of green certificates is the result of this obligation. This buy-in at time-premium is a way for electricity providers to pay for your investment instead of investing on their own.
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
Back to "hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 222 guests