As far as I'm concerned, I'm not at all upset, on the contrary, your intervention is very constructive, in particular because it traces a "historical" course.
I find your judgment a bit harsh on eolprocess, although the technical difficulties you raise are justified. He also made an error of appreciation by saying that his machine will have an extraordinary performance compared to a three-bladed, I quote "because the three-bladed lets all the wind pass."
In fact, Eolprocess would, as you say, need to validate its structure and mecaflux calculations. The concept is not so bad from my point of view. However, we should be around 25% yield, I say that of course intuitively and unfounded ...
Regarding patents. I'm not a fan of it, far from it. It is essentially a question of obtaining authorship over the invention supported by the INPI's prior art research.
There are as many ways to use a patent as there are applicants. Massive international strategies are only reserved for large groups. This is unattainable and unreasonable even for good sized SMEs.
Otherwise, every day, case law and / or misappropriation (patent-breakers) break patents, brands and models posed at great cost to SGDG factories (without government guarantee) that are INPI and WIPO.
I say provocatively that if there is one way to be poorly protected, it is to make patents and only patents.
On the other hand, the fact of applying for a patent and then disclosing it on forums, a website is much more powerful and inexpensive. Everything that is disclosed is no longer patentable or exploitable, except by those who hold the copyright on the invention, consisting of the sole disclosure, and in the event of litigation, the provision of justice to even a non-functional or incomplete prototype ...
Large Groups, despite their financial power, fear Copyright, and it is generally with this property right intellectual (and not industrial ...) that the most resounding lawsuits are being made for firms industrial.
The restriction of protection to the field of the patent stricto sensu is illusory: Saint Hilaire is known worldwide for being the so-called creator of the Quasiturbine: as Jean Pierre Ambert says, he created only the name and not the machine.
Even Mr. Ambert who re-invented the concept in good faith in 1980 was confronted with prior art of a deformable diamond motor with 4 rotating blades in a substantially elliptical enclosure ...
The only thing Saint Hilaire did was to wriggle his claims, and it ended up happening, even by roughly reworking the exact same thing ... 4 blades in an elliptical enclosure: the rotary diamond motor!
Small revealing example of the eye powder that is a patent (in defiance of the considerable expense it generates internationally), in terms of operating rights, even for a large group ... a small piece of paper close to that of a lotto ticket. You can win a lot rarely and lose a lot most of the time.
Thank you for your complimentary remarks on the creations of Jam Pascal, Marcel and SYCOMOREEN; and I would say that you haven't seen everything yet!
