indy49 wrote:I also doubt that, even if it exists, this vacuum energy is exploitable.
actually starting from this irrefutable principle it becomes unusable
Hydraxon wrote:Now, no, there is no reason to hope that it will work. Let's not forget that energy conservation has survived all of these discoveries or assumptions.
Tagor wrote:indy49 wrote:I also doubt that, even if it exists, this vacuum energy is exploitable.
actually starting from this irrefutable principle it becomes unusable
renaud67 wrote:Certainly but very certainly that if we put part of the 26 billion € that we give to car manufacturers to develop clean energies we would have more results in any case from an ecological point of view.
Tagor wrote:indy49 wrote:I just find that we are still dangling free and infinite energies ...
is it to make the nuclear pill swallow smoothly?
Hydraxon wrote:Now, no, there is no reason to hope that it will work. Let's not forget that energy conservation has survived all of these discoveries or assumptions.
Capt_Maloche wrote:The cover page of the article on Science and life Special edition of September 2008
Be careful, (I see the budding free energy researchers coming ) this notion of vacuum energy is extremely complex to grasp, of the same order as the notion of infinity
For the moment, in the state of our poor knowledge of the world, on a quantum scale the calculations predict 10 exp 112 Joules per m3 of space !!! and 115 times less with the still unrestricted theory of relativity (E = mC²)
energy is matter and vice versa
and when 2 valid theories are also divergent on such a subject, there is reason to question everything
Stunning! you wanted science fiction LieTseu?
Back to "hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ..."
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 345 guests