EcoThink slideshow: solving energy problems

Renewable energies except solar electric or thermal (seeforums dedicated below): wind turbines, energy from the sea, hydraulic and hydroelectricity, biomass, biogas, deep geothermal energy ...
User avatar
Woodcutter
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 4731
Registration: 07/11/05, 10:45
Location: Mountain ... (Trièves)
x 2




by Woodcutter » 07/04/09, 14:21

Elec wrote:Lumberjack, can you read?

It's too bad means it's fool. [...]
Elec can you read?
It's too bad in everyday French, means it's stupid, it's a shame, etc ...


If you are trying by all means to pass yourself off as a victim, it is you who has a problem, not the others ...

How many will we have to tell you the same thing?
0 x
"I am a big brute, but I rarely mistaken ..."
User avatar
Woodcutter
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 4731
Registration: 07/11/05, 10:45
Location: Mountain ... (Trièves)
x 2




by Woodcutter » 07/04/09, 14:35

Elec at 23:47 p.m. wrote:[...]
I answered your n th question on electric cars 2.0, in the same way as I answered all the questions you asked me on the subject. I have given enough.

bye

Elec at 23:54 p.m. wrote:[...]
Woodcutter wrote: For Megane

I took time to answer all your questions on the 2.0 car, I answered the question on the mega with precise references. No doubt too referenced, moreover, on reading your comments.

Bye.
: Shock:
You answered me in everything and for everything, to this question: "No"followed by a link to your site that talks about a PROJECT solar thermal power plant (when?) when I ask you a question about the situation CURRENT of Israel and its electric kWh at 800 g of CO2 ... : roll: (Better Place is tomorrow morning, right?)

Your contemptuous attitude towards those who ask you questions (who embarrass you?) Is absolutely not consistent with the (false?) Image that you want to give of yourself, that is to say the scientist who does not wants to debate only ideas (and that violently attacks all those who do not agree with him at the same time ...)

How do you want, with behaviors like that, to be credible?

However, even I readily admit that certain aspects of your work are very interesting.
But you show, on this forum at least a behavior so "smelly" that it no longer makes you want to be interested in what you can write and that's a shame ...
0 x
"I am a big brute, but I rarely mistaken ..."
User avatar
Woodcutter
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 4731
Registration: 07/11/05, 10:45
Location: Mountain ... (Trièves)
x 2




by Woodcutter » 07/04/09, 14:41

lejustemilieu wrote:[...]
Lumberjack! no comment please : Cheesy:
Read too late ... What subject?
0 x
"I am a big brute, but I rarely mistaken ..."
Elec
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 779
Registration: 21/12/08, 20:38




by Elec » 07/04/09, 16:08

Exchange without any interest.
Last edited by Elec the 12 / 04 / 09, 19: 37, 13 edited once.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972




by Christophe » 07/04/09, 16:10

RIAZ wrote:Has Been Removed Slideshow

This slideshow is no longer available.


: Shock: :|
0 x
Elec
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 779
Registration: 21/12/08, 20:38




by Elec » 07/04/09, 16:12

Riaz wrote: Methodological mockery (...) whoever built a real wall makes fun of kicks in his work.

Whoever has strong arguments and bibliographic references does not need to try to kick others and use the "mockery mode" you claim. Arguments and references are sufficient. And he is effectively indifferent to unfounded systems of ideas (eg the theory of inevitable decline that you advocate). On the other hand, to exchange constructively, it requires that the conditions for positive exchange are met.
Last edited by Elec the 12 / 04 / 09, 19: 39, 10 edited once.
0 x
User avatar
renaud67
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 638
Registration: 26/12/05, 11:44
Location: marseille
x 8




by renaud67 » 07/04/09, 16:35

that requirements ... :? that leaves little room for negotiation as to how to proceed ...
0 x
The absurdities of yesterday are the truths of today and tomorrow banalities.
(Alessandro Marandotti)
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972




by Christophe » 07/04/09, 16:39

Pkoi change the name "on the way"? : Shock:
0 x
Elec
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 779
Registration: 21/12/08, 20:38




by Elec » 07/04/09, 16:48

Exchange without any interest.
Last edited by Elec the 12 / 04 / 09, 19: 38, 1 edited once.
0 x
RIAZ
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 391
Registration: 04/10/08, 10:21
Location: Cholet
x 2




by RIAZ » 08/04/09, 20:44

Addressing me ...
Elec wrote:The approach that you are trying to make fun of (which is that of F. Lempérière, polytechnician, internationally recognized specialist in renewable energies of which I speak in the slideshow), is very solid.


I read in the doc by F. Lempérière:

Given the dynamism of developing countries, it is likely that, in the second half of the century, ten billion global users will have on average the current income of industrialized countries and a lower energy consumption per capita, but of the same order. . This will represent a world consumption of energy five times higher than today, equivalent per year to fifty billion tons of fossil fuel, used mainly in the form of 80 to 100.000 TWh of electrical energy (instead of 15.000 TWh currently ).


I wrote :
RIAZ wrote:I note that the promoter of this idea of ​​a factor of 5 (upside down!) Considers as normal, if not guaranteed, the supply of the current energy consumption of the affluent minority of humanity, to the 9 billion humans of the 2050s… ..
Everyone has to appreciate ... the uselessness of the thing, well before analyzing its realism. Indeed, we know today that our organizational methods waste by construction and that we have very high potential savings. What would be the use of extending this unfortunate practice to the rest of humanity?

All this is very similar to the endless pirouette of the dog which cannot bite its tail.


If expressing a different point of view than that which you support is of mockery, either it is necessary to revise your vocabulary, or you communicate your writings only to friends who are always in agreement with you and who applaud.
The fact that F. Lempérière is a Polytechnician and known abroad does not add an ounce of credibility (nor take it away from that) to what writes.
I know polytechnicians who would rob him in the feathers in a much more ferocious way.

I maintain that this Gentleman is among the people who believe trees rise to the sky, like many others of the "ruling" class who have just caused the current crash in the economy.

On the other hand, the 15000 TWh of electricity production to which he refers places this writing around 2000 and it is true that at that time it was necessary to be NO LIMIT.
0 x
In terms of the future, it is not to foresee it, but to enable it (Antoine de Saint Exupery)

Back to "hydraulic, wind, geothermal, marine energy, biogas ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 211 guests