US Patent No. 512340 and 685012 Tesla and Free Energy

[massinissa]

Hello,
Being passionate about the idea of ​​free energy, I tried to reconstruct some processes that related to so-called unitary systems but my results were disappointing (total failure) especially since it becomes discouraging because no one has been able to successfully replicate at least one of the hundreds of these "patented" processes. If someone has been successful in this area, I would ask them to tell me which system to bet on.
I looked for issues in all directions (parity violation, vortex and anti-vortex…), these subjects are beyond me; but how to get out of this labyrinth of free energy * without leaving it soulless?

So a semblance of courage and we continue by invoking a few conceptions:
Part A) Has Tesla ever solved the energy problem *?
1) US patent N ° 512340 from Tesla “Coil for electromagnets”: www.tfcbooks.com/patents/coil.htm
Is the EMF force (Lenz's law) lowered in these bifilar coils? How to get the ideal resonance for these coils *? What would be their optimal uses of free energy *? Does the Möebius coil get the same effect *?
2) US Patent N ° 685012 from Tesla “Means for increasing the intensity of electrical oscillations”: www.tfcbooks.com/patents/super_c.htm A passage from this patent particularly caught my attention *: “* The receiving coil B 'is energized stronger in proportion and induces currents of greater intensity in the circuits A'. It is evident from the above that the greater the number of the freely-vibrating circuits which alternately receive and transmit energy from one to another the greater, relatively, will be the gain secured by applying my invention “.
If I understood correctly Tesla announces an increase in the intensity of the induced current, but what will be the consequence on its voltage *? This century-old patent indicates a resistance problem hence the need to cool its circuits, can't this problem be solved with the use of superconducting coils (whatever the costs) *? Can we supply its circuits with direct current and loop it with batteries !!!?
For me, I just discovered this process, I have not yet understood how it works, for this I need more informed opinions before experimenting.

3) Some references concerning the study of coils in conical or flat spirals:

www.patentstorm.us/patents/5642049.htm , www.vortexengine.ca/index.shtml , http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/atep1.htm ...
I understand from several sources dealing with these forms of coils that at least we get an intense magnetic field (gains compared to normal coils) even in DC, so I simply ask myself the following question *: why this type of coils are not used to improve the efficiency of AC or DC electric motors, depending on the type to which they can be applied *?

Part B) Cold electric energy as opposed to magnetic fields *:
I found theoretical analyzes (pushed at the level of elementary particles) on electricity and magnetism in the pages of http://magnetism.otc.co.nz/index.htm among which an explanation of the operation of Searl's disk tempted me to believe in an analogy with flat tesla coils *: movement of electrons in a flat spiral in both cases except that one uses motion and the other injects a current . http://magnetism.otc.co.nz/Magnetism.htm#SearlDisc
An experience reported in the “Precession and the Isotope line” page http://magnetism.otc.co.nz/Precession.htm reveals a creation of electrical energy (surprisingly) *: a thin copper plate is introduced and inclined at 45 ° between two powerful magnets forced into opposition, no movement is applied to either the plate or the magnets and yet the The end of the plate has become cold, the effect of this experience in the words of the author: "* A cold energy collects near the end of the extension piece which is colder further from the magnets *".
Probably there has been a displacement of electrons in the plate towards the part bathed in the two compressed magnetic fields, this remains to be confirmed.
In the same vein, the treatment of water exposed to opposite uniform magnetic fields reveals that the compressed field of two poles SS expands water by adding a positive electric charge and that that of the two poles NN contracts the water by adding a negative charge. The most informed will say that it is only the movement of water in the pipe that causes these effects.

I have not yet done experiments to measure these effects on static matters, but I have a crazy idea that contradicts the law of induction. Too bad being out of ideas, I still don't have the least worse * than this one: if we have four powerful magnets, two are forced in South-South opposition and the two others in North-North opposition, the fields Magnets are compressed to the maximum by bringing the magnets as close as possible, I think that a weak current will flow (from NN to SS) in a conductor connected between two copper plates placed at 45 ° in the two fields compression zones. If we manage to measure any current (without any movement of the copper or the magnets) we can look for the material (ferromagnetic, paramagnetic, diamagnetic, with doped junctions, ...) or the chemical solution which will react ideally to each of the two compression zones magnetic fields. Excuse me for adding another delirium *: will the application of compressed magnetic fields to a chemical dipole have an effect of restitution or improvement of its charge *? If and only if this is possible we can use two conical coils (with an intense magnetic field) supplied with DC by a battery, these coils must be oriented to focus their magnetic fields from two sides of the battery and in opposition NN to each other. the other, the electrolyte bathing in the compression zone of these fields will perhaps have an effect of recharging the battery and the energy not consumed by the coils will be returned to it (on condition of reducing their resistances *: less conductors resistive or get by with solutions such as liquid nitrogen). If the charge gains exceed the consumption of the coils, then where do the additional electrons * come from? At this stage we will know how to manage to find a mathematical artifice and explanations of photon type and their interactions with the vortices in matter (ascending and descending vortices observed by tunneling microscopes) while the balance between these vortex is disturbed by compressed magnetic fields; in short, this is only imagination, the experience may give us something else.

My head is confused, I wish you will help me see more clearly or convince me to take it down.

Friendships.
MASSINISSA.

[caracole]

Find here, a discussion on Nicolas Tesla and his work delighted me!

It looks like someone has succeeded with the "elemental rod generator"

The videos on googlevideo are pretty amazing.
On googlevideo
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-635987818295327978

A Japanese company markets a product-
Some time ago I encountered this amazing document (but in Japanese) - The contact person of the company in question does not speak English - and I do not speak Japanese!

The lien http://freenrg.fr/JapRod/EnergyReceiver.zip Zip file contains photos
We can find out more about peswiki here:

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Elemental_Rod_Generator#Official_Website

And then again while searching, this very interesting page appeared to me.

http://freenrg.fr/JapRod/Explic_En_Francais.html

So, Info, intox? if it really works, i'm ready to invest a few hundred watts and euros to get started.

So who knows more?

Pierre