We look forward to seeing you!
Phil, for your contribution which goes in the direction of my approach: for concrete questions, I trust collective intelligence and prefer to make my contribution in a more theoretical form, which is also inseparable from the practical considerations which result from it.
Si
Guy would like to constitute a catalog, I think it will find food for thought in the writings of
Ivan Illitch, which, in particular, distinguished the user-friendly technique from the alienating technique which makes man heteronomous to the latter (or will say to put it simply: low-tech and high-tech).
Grelinette I appreciate your analysis, however when you write:
In this sense, the "Greta Thunberg" method is very interesting and admirable, because, step by step, part of a simple individual strike in front of the door of her school, she now manages to be the guest of honor for speak out before the UN! ...
It does not seem inappropriate to me to think that when the institutions show themselves to be sensitive to this point, it is because they intend to use it for their own benefit, as I have already had the opportunity to express: the " energy transition "is an extraordinary market!
Eclectron, desertion is practically impossible and, since I was talking about it just now,
Ivan Illitch explained in this regard that any technical development devalued previous practices by making them useless, ineffective or inapplicable. All ideology tends to be totalizing, that is to say to include all forms of activity and to exclude those which do not conform to it. This competition makes it difficult to survive outside the system *, but that a few "escape" will in no way oppose this system: it can only be refractories who will thus have become inaudible and invisible ...
* On another scale, it is this same competition which is exerted by the enriched countries on the producers of the less "advanced" countries.
