Nuclear power continues in the world

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13882
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1562
Contact :

Re: Nuclear continues in the world




View izentrop » 18/07/20, 22:42

China to build 6 to 8 nuclear reactors per year from 2020 to 2025 https://issues.fr/chine-reacteurs-nucleaires/
China will build six to eight nuclear reactors per year between 2020 and 2025 and increase the total capacity to 70 gigawatts (GW), an increase of 43,5% from the end of May, the official China Daily said on Thursday. (July 9), citing the country's nuclear association.

The China Nuclear Energy Association said China's total nuclear capacity is expected to reach 52 GW by the end of 2020, which is below the target of 58 GW.
And we close : Shock:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79674
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11213

Re: Nuclear continues in the world




View Christophe » 19/07/20, 09:27

Normal China is able to build 6 to 8 in 5 years ... Edf is not screwed to make 1 in 20 years ...

Yes better to close under these conditions : Cheesy: : Cheesy: : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: Nuclear continues in the world




View GuyGadebois » 19/07/20, 12:32

izentrop wrote:China will build 6 to 8 nuclear reactors per year from 2020 to 2025 .....And we close : Shock:

Yes, China IS GOING to build, and we're shutting down some 40-plus-year old shit (and we'd better shut down the Bugey shit too). Do you see the difference ?
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13882
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1562
Contact :

Re: Nuclear continues in the world




View izentrop » 19/07/20, 14:21

That could run for another 40 years with no worries, as security updates were tightened.
For someone who cares about global warming, this just doesn't make sense.
In Switzerland and the USA, they were not so stupid.
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: Nuclear continues in the world




View GuyGadebois » 19/07/20, 14:23

izentrop wrote:That could run for another 40 years with no worries, as security updates were tightened.
For someone who cares about global warming, this just doesn't make sense.

But let's see. Who is speaking? The advanced nuclear physicist? The engineer, the power plant designer? The expert in maintenance of production units? Oh no, "the electronics technician in telephony" "specialist in portal electrification and emeritus programmer in arduino home automation" which supports the industrial food industry, agrochemicals, GMOs and other main causes of warming .... Thank you anyway .
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13882
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1562
Contact :

Re: Nuclear continues in the world




View izentrop » 19/07/20, 21:20

The guy with the big wooden club who knows no other argument than personal attack wrote:
izentrop wrote:That could run for another 40 years with no worries, as security updates were tightened.
For someone who cares about global warming, this just doesn't make sense.
But let's see. Who is speaking? The advanced nuclear physicist? The engineer, the power plant designer? The expert in maintenance of production units? Oh no, "the electronics technician in telephony" "specialist in portal electrification and emeritus programmer in arduino home automation" which supports the industrial food industry, agrochemicals, GMOs and other main causes of warming .... Thank you anyway .
So when we play with jewelry, we have the truth :?: : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 10151
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2873

Re: Nuclear continues in the world




View sicetaitsimple » 19/07/20, 22:30

izentrop wrote:
The guy with the big wooden club who knows no other argument than personal attack wrote:
izentrop wrote:That could run for another 40 years with no worries, as security updates were tightened.
For someone who cares about global warming, this just doesn't make sense.
But let's see. Who is speaking? The advanced nuclear physicist? The engineer, the power plant designer? The expert in maintenance of production units? Oh no, "the electronics technician in telephony" "specialist in portal electrification and emeritus programmer in arduino home automation" which supports the industrial food industry, agrochemicals, GMOs and other main causes of warming .... Thank you anyway .
So when we play with jewelry, we have the truth :?: : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:


No, Izentrop, you can't say that!
You, you are just a con "electronic technician in telephony"; but he is an ex-jeweler who knows a lot about nuclear power, He has the truth, there is no doubt about it. You have to put in your head that on any subject ((nuclear power is only a trifle in its universal palette), the truth emanates from the exceptional jeweler, which allows him to "t ' insult".
Poor forum...
3 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: Nuclear continues in the world




View GuyGadebois » 19/07/20, 23:21

izentrop wrote:So when we play with jewelry, we have the truth :?: : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:

Play smart with your shit smileys ... but it is not me who decided the life of the power plants, no more than you, and 40 years was the max. Keep playing with your portal.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14146
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 845

Re: Nuclear continues in the world




View Flytox » 20/07/20, 11:33

izentrop wrote:China to build 6 to 8 nuclear reactors per year from 2020 to 2025 https://issues.fr/chine-reacteurs-nucleaires/
China will build six to eight nuclear reactors per year between 2020 and 2025 and increase the total capacity to 70 gigawatts (GW), an increase of 43,5% from the end of May, the official China Daily said on Thursday. (July 9), citing the country's nuclear association.

The China Nuclear Energy Association said China's total nuclear capacity is expected to reach 52 GW by the end of 2020, which is below the target of 58 GW.
And we close : Shock:


Yes, first we taught them to do the wrong thing (build nuclear power plants), then they will find out on their own how to make them fart (just wait), then the step of pulling them will come. good conclusions of the disasters that have occurred, hoping that they will be less stupid than at home and that they will shut down all their plants for good instead of waiting each time for the next nuclear apocalypse to pretend to strengthen security ... of which is not securable .....
If this happens, they will understand before us the importance of the security of the populations before all other mercantile considerations etc ...
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: Nuclear continues in the world




View GuyGadebois » 20/07/20, 12:17

Flytox wrote:If this happens, they will understand before us the importance of the security of the populations before all other mercantile considerations etc ...

But when it comes to French nuclear power, there is no longer any commercial consideration. If you consider the true price of this whole mess, from construction to dismantling, it's not profitable. EDF loses billions between its bad choices, its failed "business", the reprocessing of waste, landfill, etc., etc. Before a power station freaks us out or clever kids decide to blow it up, we must stop this sector as quickly as possible "point bar" as the other would say.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 140 guests