I love the latest Greenwashing pub by Areva

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
netshaman
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 532
Registration: 15/11/08, 12:57
x 2

I love the latest Greenwashing pub by Areva




by netshaman » 03/02/11, 19:39

Wow, great!
I adore!
Especially in the end when we see the nuclear power plant all clean on it next to the field of wind turbines and pv panels, it is class!
And super Ecolo wow too strong, misses more than pitis zoizeaux ...
And the slogan: "let's produce with less co2!"
They are too strong anyway to pass bladders for neons!
(And I did say neons)
To make believe that nuclear energy is a renewable energy, so it breaks me the ...!
There is no bullshit near I see ...
: Mrgreen:

Edit by Christophe: to know what is talking about here is the ad in question
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eQ1hp7PFQg

Decryption video by Sortir du Nucléaire: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8do3qgk7uDg
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 03/02/11, 20:14

Just add some photos of Chernobyl 1986 and Chelyabinsk 1957 on youtube to this advertisement !!!!
and some malformed children.

Opposite result ??????
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79584
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11165




by Christophe » 03/02/11, 20:23

Uh, do you have a link to the pub in question?

I have in mind the one on the history of "industrial energy" but I did not hear (or understand) the same message as you ...

Yes they show wind turbines and solar panels (greenwashing) but they do not claim that the nuke is renewable ... only that humanity needs more energy ...
Last edited by Christophe the 03 / 02 / 11, 20: 26, 1 edited once.
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19247
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3515




by Janic » 03/02/11, 20:25

There are 50 years, the companies that launched in the depollution belonged to the big companies strongly polluting. It's called winning on all fronts.
Otherwise the advertising is well done since the average consumer will remember only what the ad suggests and not what it really represents.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79584
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11165




by Christophe » 03/02/11, 20:28

Janic wrote:There are 50 years, the companies that launched in the depollution belonged to the big companies strongly polluting. It's called winning on all fronts.


Ah? Because it's more the case now? : Shock:
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28925
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5643




by Obamot » 03/02/11, 20:53

So demago, that it can be the object of a work of diversion of meaning to make it a pastiche not ... : Mrgreen:
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 03/02/11, 22:11

That's what I said, adding to this TV ad some pictures of Chernobyl and Chelyabinsk !!

Moreover it is possible to make a trial for false or misleading advertising.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79584
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11165




by Christophe » 04/02/11, 09:46

If I think of the same ad as you there is no obvious and formal deception: they say an energy with less CO2 ... so:

a) already they say no (as the nuke lobby said a few years ago) WITHOUT CO2 ... but with LESS CO2 ... so good point.

b) speech does not sell the nuke as a renewable energy. Do not confuse CO2 and renewability ...

Am not pro nuke and I can not defend them but you must not exaggerate ... level foutage mouth have already done much worse than that!

Then the message: coal -> petroleum -> nuke -> enr is there and is not that bad ...

Too bad they have not started advertising by ... the wood that has been the main energy of humanity for ... uh I do not know when to start counting ... 40 000 years?
0 x
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6670
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 1727




by Macro » 04/02/11, 10:36

dedeleco wrote:That's what I said, adding to this TV ad some pictures of Chernobyl and Chelyabinsk !!

Moreover it is possible to make a trial for false or misleading advertising.


Go go there ... Take a lawyer and go do everything peter..T'as all you need in scientific arguments to make everything peter ....

AREVA is a very big pack of good big sous ... Who hold by the nose 80% of European and African leaders ... Vas y Dédélco ...

Alas he could even advertise that plutonium is good in baby bottle they would be unattackable ....
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28925
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5643




by Obamot » 04/02/11, 11:53

It reminds me of EDF which has the virtual monopoly of the electricity market and who advertises for ... them! While they have no competitor !!!

The most hilarious is that all these "pubs", in the end it's us who pay them ... necessarily ... : Mrgreen:
0 x

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 137 guests