GuyGadebois wrote:The idiots are released:
Fessenheim: plant workers threaten not to shut down reactor 1
sicetaitsimple wrote:Even if we understood that basically you were the only one who was not stupid ....
GuyGadebois wrote:sicetaitsimple wrote:Even if we understood that basically you were the only one who was not stupid ....
It's good to recognize it.
sicetaitsimple wrote:You do what you want with it.
sicetaitsimple wrote:The drop in power is already visible on the RTE site.
Christophe wrote:sicetaitsimple wrote:The drop in power is already visible on the RTE site.
Source?
bardal wrote:Oh, the measurement is very simple: we analyze the ash (the "flywheels" that go off in the smoke and the ash and clinker remaining in the ashtray) and we make a rule of three to find the annual production. These radioactive products are naturally found in coal (which is one of the minerals richest in radioactive metals) and are found concentrated by a factor of 100 in the ashes (the carbon has burned). The Robin des Bois association had made a detailed report on this question a few years ago, but it seems to have disappeared from the radars… In an ash heap, there is enough to make 5 or 6 atomic bombs… The kids play on it , rabbits and others dig burrows there, rainwater trickles down there ... Life is good.
bardal wrote:The babyline wiggles there as every time it detects radiation; radon is emitted as every time there is uranium, and the groundwater is contaminated as in all radioactive soils (Vichy water is much worse). There is only CRIIRAD to be surprised by the radioactive soils of Limousin (or Brittany, or Corsica ...) and radon emanations from the cellars in Limoges;
It is true that this large independent laboratory, which is our national pride, had well confused a naturally radioactive Camargue beach (and well known as such) with radioactive waste from Marcoule placed there, maliciously, by the nuclear lobby.
Likewise, confusing mining waste (which is nothing other than natural soil too poor in ore to be exploited) with waste from a nuclear power plant is gross ignorance.
Waste from a power plant is known, listed, processed, monitored; the 1% actually radiotoxic is subject to a thorough treatment and will be enclosed in a glass matrix, intended to be stored 600 m underground, in a layer of clay (dry, it is a rock); this solution, not ideal since of limited size, has at least the advantage of being reliable and secure.
Generation 4 will allow find a more satisfactory solution by incinerating the most radioactive waste, making it disappear finally.
All this is not "as simple and as cheap as possible" but it has made it possible to know no victims or deaths in 40 years of exploitation ...
bardal wrote: It is true that this large independent laboratory, which is our national pride, had well confused a naturally radioactive Camargue beach (and well known as such) with radioactive waste from Marcoule placed there, maliciously, by the nuclear lobby.
Chaired by an anti vaccine, anti science https://www.lepoint.fr/societe/vaccins- ... 075_23.php Bravo information
Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"
Users browsing this forum : Majestic-12 [Bot] and 182 guests
