Exnihiloest wrote:Remundo wrote:...
there are also phenomena of bio-accumulation of radionuclides (in mushrooms, plants or milk) which temporarily made food dangerous, especially where it had rained.
Possible.
Epidemiological studies would show it?
No epidemiological study could account for the impact of Chernobyl fallout. The cancers on the rise today are certainly part of this incident, but how can we give irrefutable proof when, on the one hand, we are not equal concerning the triggering of cancers, that Chernobyl is a factor among others and that politics is not about transparency?
There are, however, strong presumptions regarding the withholding of state information and the torpedoing of initiatives to get an idea of the results:
I) Premature termination and disappearance of a regional register of childhood cancers in 1996 after an excess of cases of thyroid cancer in children were recorded.
This is the PACA-Corsica region register, opened in 1984. Before it was stopped, the data had been changed after intervention by the General Directorate of Health.
http://www.nuage-radioactif.com/wp-cont ... e-1996.jpgII) A peak of cases of neonatal hypothyroidism in the PACA Corsica region, in 1986, a very significant pathology of nuclear pollution, passed over in silence and not studied by the manager of the registry due to a refusal by the hierarchy.
http://www.nuage-radioactif.com/wp-cont ... e-1996.jpgThe following here for those who are interested but not for those who pretend to be interested when they already have their opinion and they don't really care:
http://www.nuage-radioactif.com/
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)