These days EDF refuses to initiate the closure of the plant because it is true, the compensation offered by the government is quite ridiculous (€ 100M is the benefit of a few weeks of operation of the plant ...). See this article from the World: http://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article/ ... _3234.html
For EDF leaders, not legally initiate the closure of Fessenheim without having agreed in advance with the State on the compensation the company will receive. Now, on this ground, no agreement is in sight. Where EDF hoped to receive at least 2 3 billion billion, Ms. Royal has proposed in early May, to pay between 80 and 100 million million "only". An amount considered paltry, even insulting, to the headquarters of the electrician. Without compromise on the issue, EDF therefore resistance. The formal submission of the closure request is not envisaged before December.
Mais..Mais..Mais where is the catch? Because what FRENCH STATE HOLDS 85% of EDF !!
The state is largely majority shareholder!
The state should be able to impose what he wants!
The state can not transfer the content to EDF leaders when he wants!
In short, the state, as widely majority shareholder, would not accountable to EDF EDF ... Because it is the state or the state is EDF (in 85%)
If the state compensates EDF ... in fact it self compensates to 85% ... so it does not cost that ultimately 15% of the money paid to him
Oh yes it remains the concerns of powerful unions EDF (who only think of themselves ...) it's probably with them that negotiations will really play ... below table?