Ahmed wrote: I am not either these speakers when they declare that China would be in adolescence crisis: my opinion being that this country has traversed at high speed the slow evolution of the European countries and is in a state close to these as for the accumulation of internal contradictions and the stagnation of the rate of profit.
Completely agree, China has simply benefited from contemporary technical means to go from feudalism to the industrial era via the communist phase.
China is like the cloned sheep
Dolly, although young (I speak of the economic and not historical entity of course) this one ages prematurely and risks disappearing even before its American-European models.
I noted, in the "remedies", the need to relaunch demography in our old countries: it would first be an additional immediate burden and then, in the long term, it would amplify the problem ...
Boosting the birth rate hardly makes sense, given that the family ratio is the consequence of the cultural processes themselves induced by the dissipation of energy: typically families in
K that is to say little offspring but with a high life expectancy and a strong access to education.
The aging of the population in France is not worrying, it is a fair return of the
baby boom, all of this should rebalance in the coming decades.
Another fundamental point: the aging of the population and the possible non-renewal of populations (as in Japan) is only a problem for economists.
It should be understood that the use of the birth rate or immigration has only one purpose:
produce future consumers.Well, a Japan with 80 million inhabitants instead of 126 million seems to me to be going rather in the good direction for the "other observers" (the fauna and the flora I mean).
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.