It is lamentable this kind of derisory pathos intended to swallow any salad; a victim, as moving and respectable as she is, can in no case account for the magnitude of a disaster, and a testimony remains a simple testimony, nothing more
CA It's a shame ! It is not a question of one or two victims here or there, but of hundreds of thousands, touched in their flesh, their families, society.
lamentable this negationism like those who denied the concentration camps, the gas chambers, for them the barracks were probably used to shelter homeless homeless people: what generosity, what greatness of soul! However it is not a question of the scale of the catastrophe, but of the scale of the victims and their sufferings.
using the misfortune of others in this way is the zero degree of human solidarity; intelligence too.
So according to you, once again, the victims of the last war (others too) should have been silent so as not to disturb the business. Human solidarity does not consist in being in solidarity with an industry, but with those who are victims, you must have a big humanist problem and as for intelligence, everyone will judge!
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré