Nuclear VS fossil fuels VS Solar .... Who wins?

[ABC2019]

Agree with the very small part ... but we don't need more !!! So where is the problem?

the concern is that the very small part to which we have access economically is much smaller than our needs, but the real problem is above all that it slips through our fingers without us knowing how to store it economically .. the problem is therefore "econological" ...

[ABC2019]

I find this very interesting volume presentation and it seems to me correct in order of magnitude!

energies_consumption_mondiale_annuelle.jpg

Found on: http://www.retrouversonnord.be/autarcie.htm

another remark: this graph also illustrates the capacity of nuclear power to "avoid global warming" (without breeding).

[Obamot]

You're better at thermodynamics than witches moving on their brooms, much better! You should explore the possibility of implementing MHD at the tip of the broom

[ABC2019]

You're better at thermodynamics than witches moving on their brooms, much better!

Remundo, since you complain about the discussions that drag on bickering, it is perhaps on this kind of post that we should intervene, right?

[Obamot]

It's you who continues your flood here, kid, nobody else (the number of my posts has been divided by ten!)

health-pollution-prevention / the-factory-of-ignorance-t16768-220.html? hilit = brooms # p435392

I fell to 3,5 posts per day (and again, that takes into account my posts from years past)

C763C879-3F89-4AF5-B5CA-65A0B0A31499.jpeg (34.25 Kio) Consulté 1901 fois

You are at 13 per day:

9DB2AF5D-02A6-4422-9A01-7848585FF012.jpeg (37.92 Kio) Consulté 1901 fois

[ABC2019]

It's you who continues your flood here, kid, nobody else (the number of my posts has been divided by ten, even a hundred!)

health-pollution-prevention / the-factory-of-ignorance-t16768-220.html? hilit = brooms # p435392

typical "fire start" attempt to start a thread on an unrelated thread, which is exactly the definition of a troll.

[thibr]

Is nuclear power good or bad for the climate? Does nuclear power worsen global warming? What are the greenhouse gas emissions from dismantling power plants, extracting uranium, and storing waste?

[Janic]

typical example of a comparison between two different problems: on the one hand CO2 pollution and on the other hand pollution by irradiation, both having an impact on life. However, it is not only the rate of carbon generated by the activities of production and dementing (which we still do not know how to do for the heart) but also the management of this waste and bury it deep to get rid of it. joins the increasingly important household and industrial waste which poses a problem or a big accident on these power plants, even like Chernobyl and F., and to mention only the CO2, it is only to fix the attention on a tree to hide the forest.
It is like proposing to a death row inmate to choose between hanging, guillotine, shooting, electrocution by emphasizing the advantages of each over the others.

[thibr]

There are those for whom it is the most dangerous energy in the world, without which we will have to quickly learn to live. And those for whom it is on the contrary a clean energy, and mastered by France. Should we learn to live without it, should we know how to live with nuclear power? Do we really have to shut down the plants? Clément Viktorovitch asks himself the question with the climatologist François-Marie Bréon, the physicist, spokesperson for NégaWatt Yves Marignac, and Nicolas Goldberg.

[Obamot]

Another totally useless video, it's not about knowing “if we can put up with nuclear power" the answer is no, it would be better not, but well how to get out of it (and I am not particularly green, but it is the biggest military shit created by the man, and therefore the question is not "si" But "when”We get out).

And I have no ideological opinion, it is obvious that we will not get out quickly or just anyhow.