Rajqawee wrote:To answer you honestly, I don't see their approach as similar.
JMC has the approach that I think you know: he thinks that the IPCC's calculations / estimates / models / theories are globally relevant and therefore that the risks announced are both serious and probable enough for it to be interesting. take care of it.
He then suggests finding the best compromise between a rapid reduction in emissions and the possible impacts on our societies (comfort, lifestyle, globalization yourself, you know).
It is therefore a fairly "classic" approach: observation-> analysis-> decision
it's a realistic approach but I wonder what figures he adopts to calculate that, since he does not even agree with a Nobel Prize in economics to quantify it ...
https://jancovici.com/publications-et-c ... le-climat/
so ok in principle, but you still have to have good data ...