ITER when?

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: ITER when?




by GuyGadebois » 12/03/20, 20:16

Exnihiloest wrote:Freedom of expression is shocking ...

Since when does a valet have freedom of expression. So your trickery has no limits? And then stop justifying yourself, your pathetic disputes it with the grotesque, in the long run.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: ITER when?




by Exnihiloest » 12/03/20, 21:38

GuyGadebois wrote:
Exnihiloest wrote:Freedom of expression is shocking ...

Since when does a valet have freedom of expression. So your trickery has no limits? And then stop justifying yourself, your pathetic disputes it with the grotesque, in the long run.

Stupidity in the raw.
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: ITER when?




by izentrop » 12/03/20, 22:18

GuyGadebois wrote:The MSRE worked four years.
I answered :
How do you explain that then :?: :?: http://samofar.eu/project/
Guy wrote:No, but it's been developed for a long time.
What does this have to do with your link which is a project?
You do not know how to read ?
The main objective of SAMOFAR is to prove the innovative safety concepts of the MSFR by advanced experimental and digital techniques, to achieve a breakthrough in nuclear safety and optimal waste management, and to create a consortium of stakeholders to demonstrate the MSFR beyond SAMOFAR.
Far from being to the point ... Stop telling Guytou bastards. (It’s to answer your sweet words : Mrgreen: )
The radioactive flux of 2 kg of tritium is about the same level as that produced by the Chernobyl accident. ”
https://www.sortirdunucleaire.org/ITER- ... ruinous and
You believe in these knights
The low energy β radioactivity causes the emitted electrons to be rapidly arrested in water and in biological tissues, after having traveled only 6 μm at most (and on average around 0,56 μm) 7. External radiation is therefore quickly stopped by the simple "dead" surface of human skin.

However, unlike their radiation, most tritiated molecules like tritiated water are easily absorbed through the skin, membranes or biological tissues of all living things. Its radioactivity therefore only makes it potentially dangerous if it is inhaled or ingested, and a priori only in the living cells that it will have penetrated. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium#Radioactivity
Besides, we make decorative objects
Image
0 x
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 15995
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5189

Re: ITER when?




by Remundo » 13/03/20, 07:25

GuyGadebois wrote:
Exnihiloest wrote:Freedom of expression is shocking ...

Since when does a valet have freedom of expression. So your trickery has no limits? And then stop justifying yourself, your pathetic disputes it with the grotesque, in the long run.

Guy, you should indeed calm down ...

I do not judge the debate on the substance, but on the form, you use econology as an outlet and you often violate the rules of "courtesy"
4 x
Image
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: ITER when?




by GuyGadebois » 15/03/20, 21:23

Remundo wrote:I do not judge the debate on the substance, but on the form, you use econology as an outlet and you often break the rules of "courtesy" [/ color]

I understand your position and make amends, however I do not use econology as a stress reliever, but as a support for a fight that I have waged against certain abjections for over 40 years. Abjections undermined by this unprecedented crisis. Like what, we are few things. : Cheesy:
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: ITER when?




by sicetaitsimple » 15/03/20, 21:57

GuyGadebois wrote:I understand your position and make amends, however I do not use econology as a stress reliever, but as a support for a fight that I have waged against certain abjections for over 40 years.
gotlib.jpg
gotlib.jpg (15.26 KIO) Viewed 2680 times
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: ITER when?




by GuyGadebois » 15/03/20, 22:06

sicetaitsimple wrote:gotlib.jpg

Copier!
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: ITER when?




by sicetaitsimple » 15/03/20, 22:19

Sorry, but I think I have some precedence, at least compared to you, on the use of Gotlib's drawings on this forum..... No importance on the bottom elsewhere ...
0 x
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 15995
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5189

Re: ITER when?




by Remundo » 15/03/20, 22:52

and be ... the vocabulary of Sicétésimple is muffled, but its illustrations are much more unbridled ... : Cheesy:
0 x
Image
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: ITER when?




by GuyGadebois » 15/03/20, 23:23

sicetaitsimple wrote:Sorry, but I think I have some precedence, at least compared to you, on the use of Gotlib's drawings on this forum..... No importance on the bottom elsewhere ...

Gisc-Mitt.JPG
Gisc-Mitt.JPG (38.55 KB) Viewed 2667 times
1 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 218 guests