it's a topic about the price of electricity
this off topic about perpetual motion is to delete here!
there is other place on this forum for that
Rate increase by the liberalization
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
Gaston wrote:Indeed, the couple is not equal for all positions.RealWheel wrote:If we look at the wheel at a time t, the torque is not equal on each side of the axis of rotation. So the wheel turns!
For example on this diagram (from the RealWheel site),
we see very clearly that apart from the mass above the axis that has a zero torque, there are more masses to the right of the axis (6) than to the left (5) which will produce a couple reverse the direction of rotation indicated by the arrow, and will stop the wheel ...
You stayed or what! If you take two symmetrical masses, the projection of the vector OM along the x axis is always higher on the left. I wrote the formulas so stop supporting the opposite!
0 x
When we will be ble to build engines in according with the real wheel of the Nature, we will Produce energy in unlimited quantities. Nikola Tesla
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
the remainder it is you who loses your time to calculate the displacement of the different piece
I am satisfied to see the center of gravity of the whole: as long as the center of gravity does not descend gravity does not produce energy
but I would like to say that this off topic has nothing to do here and everything must be deleted or moved
I am satisfied to see the center of gravity of the whole: as long as the center of gravity does not descend gravity does not produce energy
but I would like to say that this off topic has nothing to do here and everything must be deleted or moved
0 x
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
chatelot16 wrote:the rest is you who is wasting your time
Fortunately that chatelot, is careful of any personal attack him, does not put oil on the fire, does not polemic, understood "the principle of a forum", him ...> Yes Fortunately!
Here, we gladly give him a Godwin point, he deserved it:
0 x
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
anyway the last real message of this topic dates from 2006 ... everything else has nothing to do and must be deleted
someone who deals with remaining one who does not understand his false and useless calculation makes me laugh
useless because it is obvious that the center of gravity can have highs and lows but does not go down on average: so no energy by gravitation
wrong, because with the movement of the lever up and down the wheel remains balanced
with a movement of the lever on the right and on the left the wheel will be very driving ... but the control levers would require energy ... no miracle to spin a wheel moving mass must provide energy
someone who deals with remaining one who does not understand his false and useless calculation makes me laugh
useless because it is obvious that the center of gravity can have highs and lows but does not go down on average: so no energy by gravitation
wrong, because with the movement of the lever up and down the wheel remains balanced
with a movement of the lever on the right and on the left the wheel will be very driving ... but the control levers would require energy ... no miracle to spin a wheel moving mass must provide energy
0 x
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
You do not agree with his stuff-thing-thing, that we understood.
But according to your main principles, saying it once should have been enough
With you, it is therefore ... "do what I say and not what I do". At the bottom, a forum for you it is to settle accounts!
For DreamWheel, it would be enough to let him discover by himself the result then!
But according to your main principles, saying it once should have been enough
With you, it is therefore ... "do what I say and not what I do". At the bottom, a forum for you it is to settle accounts!
For DreamWheel, it would be enough to let him discover by himself the result then!
0 x
- plasmanu
- Econologue expert
- posts: 2847
- Registration: 21/11/04, 06:05
- Location: The 07170 Lavilledieu viaduct
- x 180
chatelot16 wrote:... because with the movement of the lever up and down the wheel remains balanced
with a movement of the lever on the right and on the left the wheel will be very driving ... but the control levers would require energy ... no miracle to spin a wheel moving mass must provide energy
This is exactly my point of view.
Actually the wheel will start (left to the left), but the force on the stator to turn the flyweight will be at least equal to the rotation.
So at best it does not turn more than a quarter turn, and at worst it blocks.
The magic of this system would be to turn the weights with zero strength: but that's magic.
0 x
"Not to see Evil, not to hear Evil, not to speak Evil" 3 little monkeys Mizaru
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 5 Replies
- 7137 views
-
Last message by Arnaud M
View the latest post
28/11/14, 20:35A subject posted in the forum : Fossil fuels: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)
-
- 24 Replies
- 12517 views
-
Last message by moinsdewatt
View the latest post
23/01/16, 13:29A subject posted in the forum : Fossil fuels: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)
Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 269 guests