Germany in 2050 without nuclear

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Germany in 2050 without nuclear




by Janic » 03/02/18, 15:49

the last wars have destroyed more buildings than this case; the two nuclear bombs razed everything indiscriminately, and Chernobyl and Fukushima were not left behind either. There are no good reasons where there are only interests! : Evil:
1 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554

Re: Germany in 2050 without nuclear




by moinsdewatt » 20/05/18, 14:55

The last onshore wind calls for tender passed to 57 € / MWh in Germany. But all was not subscribed (604 MW out of 670 proposed)

Latest German onshore wind energy auction results come in at € 57 / MWh

May 18, 2018 evwind

Bid prices in Germany's latest onshore wind round rose to an average of € 57.3 / MWh following an auction that was under-subscribed. According to the German Federal Network Agency, BNetzA, 604 MW of wind capacity across 111 bids entered the second German onshore wind auction this year. This was less than the 670 MW that was on offer.
...................

https://www.evwind.es/2018/05/18/latest ... 7mwh/63473
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Germany in 2050 without nuclear




by izentrop » 30/07/18, 02:06

As Heatwave tests renewable energy limits, anti-nuclear governments return to nuclear

Do not pay attention to the turn of the sentences, this is from the automatic translation:
Even anti-nuclear governments are turning to nuclear power to cope with a record heat wave, which has increased the demand for electricity to power air conditioning worldwide.

To meet the growing demand for electricity, the South Korean anti-nuclear government announced last week that it would reduce the number of operating nuclear reactors from 14 to 19, even relaunching two reactors due to be shut down this summer. for maintenance.


Anti-nuclear Germany had to rely heavily on its remaining nuclear power plants and its coal-fired power plants, even during daylight hours, when Germany's solar panels are at peak production. The reason? Very little wind.

In June, the Taiwanese anti-nuclear government was forced to restart a closed nuclear reactor in order to meet demand. Last year, the island nation experienced its worst power outage, with seven million homes left without electricity.

In anticipation of high demand for electricity during the summer, the Japanese government has accelerated the restart of nuclear reactors shut down after Fukushima. Nuclear capacity has almost doubled since March.

The dependence of nuclear power plants on nuclear power plants shows the limits of renewable energy ...
0 x
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554

Re: Germany in 2050 without nuclear




by moinsdewatt » 30/07/18, 08:22

2018, Germany exceeds 41% of renewable electricity production ... and France?

Frédéric DOUARDJuly 5, 2018

While the French criticize Germany for its transitional use of coal for having removed the nuclear danger from its production, this country works hard and nibbles each year in market shares in fossil electricity, now that the fissile is out of service. In France, on the other hand, EDF and the State are bracing themselves on a breathless nuclear system which risks at any time the major accident, through negligence (massive subcontracting), out of date or through terrorist action, as evidenced by the report of the parliamentary commission of inquiry made public on July 5, 2018.

In Germany, the Fraunhofer ISE Institute has published the latest electricity production figures for the first half of 2018: 113 TWh. During this period, electricity from renewable sources therefore provided 41,5% of total electricity production, the best score in its history in Germany.

Image

This performance is to be compared with that of France, half as good as that of Germany: 97,3 TWh over a rolling year, representing a coverage rate by renewables of 20,1%, according to the latest figures published by RTE.

In Germany, wind power comes in at the top of renewable sources with 55,2 TWh, biomass in second position with 23 TWh while the country is smaller than France and therefore has fewer resources, then photovoltaics with 22,3, 12,5 TWh and hydroelectricity with XNUMX TWh.

Image
Distribution of energy sources for electricity production in Germany in the first half of 2018, source Fraunhofer ISE


In France, in a slippery year, hydraulics came out on top with 11,2%, followed by wind power at 5,5%, by solar power at 1,9%, and by bioenergy at 1,5% then that France has the largest biomass resource in the European Union. Note that these figures also cover very contrasting levels of investment and efficiency: for example, solar energy, which mobilized investment of 7900 MW, produces only 9,3 TWh over one year, while the French bioenergy sector which only benefited from 1900 MW installed, produced almost as much with 7,2 TWh over one year.

Thus, as in Germany, which has strongly boosted bioenergy and which is now reaping the benefits, it would also be advisable in France to invest judiciously, while not neglecting production systems with high availability such as biomass. In France, biomass has indeed produced over the last rolling year 3800 MWh per installed MW, more than three times more than solar with only 1177 MWh per installed MW.

Let us hope that the multi-year energy programming being prepared in France will be able to take this into account.

Frédéric douard

https://www.bioenergie-promotion.fr/559 ... la-france/

At this train in 4 years Germany will pass to 50% of the electricity of renewable origin.
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Germany in 2050 without nuclear




by izentrop » 30/07/18, 08:42

moinsdewatt wrote:At this train in 4 years Germany will pass to 50% of the electricity of renewable origin.
Figures to put in perspective because we should not count wind and solar in the same way, since they do not meet demand when we call on them during peaks of heat and cold spikes.
0 x
Bardal
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 509
Registration: 01/07/16, 10:41
Location: 56 and 45
x 198

Re: Germany in 2050 without nuclear




by Bardal » 30/07/18, 20:11

What seems a little odd to me about these figures is that they do not correspond with those in my possession (source AIE); the difference is globally a little over 4% (in addition for renewable energies according to Fraunhofer, or F. Drouard, we do not know); oddly, these 4% and a few correspond exactly to "other" energy production, ie the share of non-renewable waste and the production of steps (already recorded).

The costing, corrected for this "error" would then be 37,7% and not 41,5%, the figure displayed for the previous year being 34,1% and not 37,7%. If this "error" is proven, it would be a new bogus figures, which are customary some zealots of ENR and admirers of the policy of our neighbors.

In the series restore reality, the German nuclear went from 11,6% to 12,7% (which makes a relative progress as important as the production ENR), the most worrying point, being that coal and lignite have increased at the expense of natural gas. As for the biomass, which is also increasing, I prefer to abstain from any comment, the damage committed by this agro-energy (and not bio-energy) in Germany being already widely denounced by various ecological NGOs; god preserve us from such an example! god or the devil, I don't care.


PS It is not beautiful to falsify the figures to try to be right at all costs.

PS2 The increase in the consumption of coal and lignite has therefore seen, ipso facto, the number of deaths linked to this energy increase by around a hundred during the first 6 months. Fortunately, they are not due to our power stations "out of breath, which risk a major accident at any time, by negligence (massive subcontracting), by obsolescence or by terrorist action, as the report of the commission shows. parliamentary inquiry made public on July 5, 2018 ", otherwise we would hear about it, and how ...
0 x
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839

Re: Germany in 2050 without nuclear




by Flytox » 31/07/18, 23:43

The dependence of nuclear power plants on nuclear power plants shows limits renewable energies ...


This shows above all the limits of a management of energy "without conscience" which does not take into account the specificities of renewable energies, the nuke of what one does with this energy ... Instead of working to limit everyone's orgy of energy waste, we try by all means to produce more and more energy without ever looking at the consequences. Every day increase the importance of problems instead of trying to solve them ....
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Germany in 2050 without nuclear




by izentrop » 01/08/18, 08:07

The world is not as radical, there is first of all a demand that the supply must satisfy.

To say that the measures to solve the problems are insufficient is more correct.
0 x
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12298
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2963

Re: Germany in 2050 without nuclear




by Ahmed » 01/08/18, 09:00

If there is "first of all a demand that the supply must satisfy", there is nothing more than to pull up the ladder!
Furthermore, we must not limit ourselves to the consequences of energy production, but take into account the effects of its consumption.
1 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839

Re: Germany in 2050 without nuclear




by Flytox » 02/08/18, 23:11

izentrop wrote:The world is not as radical, there is first a demand as the supply must satiate.

To say that the measures to solve the problems are insufficient is more correct.


"must" , it would suffice that there is a request for there to be a duty to satisfy it !!! ???????? Fortunately, not everyone works like that, we will easily get anything, anything ....... : roll: : Mrgreen:

The "duty" should rather be to think about the demands and their consequences before starting to do anything. Don't let the power hurt the profiteers.
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.

[Eugène Ionesco]

http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 227 guests