Fukushima 10 years after the disaster

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Fukushima 10 years after the disaster




by Exnihiloest » 16/03/21, 19:59

Obamot wrote:... it seemed obvious that this plant (like others) should have been built a little higher ...

It was not easy for the Japanese engineers.
But why didn't you say it sooner ?! : Lol:
0 x
Leo Maximus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2183
Registration: 07/11/06, 13:18
x 124

Re: Fukushima 10 years after the disaster




by Leo Maximus » 17/03/21, 19:11

On youtube, Michel Chevalet reveals that the Japanese reactors had a serious design flaw, the control rods work from below:



He adds that the American and European reactors do not have this defect, the control rods work from above.

However, the Fukushima reactors are from the American General Electric ... :D
Last edited by Leo Maximus the 17 / 03 / 21, 19: 23, 2 edited once.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79353
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11059

Re: Fukushima 10 years after the disaster




by Christophe » 17/03/21, 19:20

Video not available

Is this a joke?

Otherwise, the cow !! Youtube nuclear censorship is even more effective than covid censorship !!
0 x
Leo Maximus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2183
Registration: 07/11/06, 13:18
x 124

Re: Fukushima 10 years after the disaster




by Leo Maximus » 17/03/21, 19:25

I put the link back and it works.

The info is at 4:30
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79353
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11059

Re: Fukushima 10 years after the disaster




by Christophe » 17/03/21, 19:39

Ah yes..temporary bug apparently?

They are at OVH maybe?

: Oops: : Oops: : Oops:

I go out...
0 x
Leo Maximus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2183
Registration: 07/11/06, 13:18
x 124

Re: Fukushima 10 years after the disaster




by Leo Maximus » 17/03/21, 19:47

And on sputniknews, I learned that it was the nuclear alert that caused thousands of deaths. : Shock: Explanation: the nuclear alert and the evacuation order are given a few moments after the earthquake. The inhabitants around the plant are extremely numerous (it is in Asia ...), tens of thousands of people rush into the streets while the tsunami arrives, suddenly there are thousands and thousands of drowned. If there had been no nuclear alert, these people would have stayed at home and the tsunami would not have claimed any lives.

Obviously, this is completely wrong. The chronology of events is well known. The tsunami happened long before the nuclear alert. Around the power station, it is an agricultural area sparsely inhabited and located much higher, it was not flooded.
1 x
Leo Maximus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2183
Registration: 07/11/06, 13:18
x 124

Re: Fukushima 10 years after the disaster




by Leo Maximus » 18/03/21, 12:38

The 10 years of the Fukushima-Daiichi disaster seen by Euronews:



Who disseminates reassuring information but ... totally false! :

"Cesium 137 disappears after 30 years". No, it is false, it is its half-life which is 30 years. And the radioactive leaks add" fresh "cesium 134 and 137.

"Tritium is a natural product"No, it only existed in trace amounts before being produced in abundance by the nuclear industry. It is ten thousand times more radioactive than radium.

"Tritium has a very short life"No, its half-life is 12,3 years. It takes more than a century for it to disappear completely.

"Il cannot be tritium in human body". Well yes, via the molecule of tritiated water which has the same chemical properties as the molecule of ordinary water.

Etc ...

Euronews misinforms.
1 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79353
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11059

Re: Fukushima 10 years after the disaster




by Christophe » 18/03/21, 12:50

Leo Maximus wrote:Obviously, this is completely wrong. The chronology of events is well known. The tsunami happened long before the nuclear alert. Around the power station, it is an agricultural area sparsely inhabited and located much higher, it was not flooded.


Bin voui ... the nuclear alert could not be done before the damage of the Tsunami ...

So what do they say about the origins of the covid at SputeNique? : Mrgreen:
0 x
Leo Maximus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2183
Registration: 07/11/06, 13:18
x 124

Re: Fukushima 10 years after the disaster




by Leo Maximus » 18/03/21, 14:03

Christophe wrote:
So what do they say about the origins of the covid at SputeNique? : Mrgreen:

It's a US plot, obviously:
https://www.rtbf.be/info/monde/detail_c ... d=10468297
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13713
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1524
Contact :

Re: Fukushima 10 years after the disaster




by izentrop » 18/03/21, 15:49

Leo Maximus wrote:
Christophe wrote:So what do they say about the origins of the covid at SputeNique? : Mrgreen:
It's a US plot, obviously:
https://www.rtbf.be/info/monde/detail_c ... d=10468297
Interesting, I didn't know https://euvsdisinfo.eu/fr/

You will be able to open a subject on it : Wink:
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : A.D. 44, Remundo and 306 guests