Fukushima 10 years after the disaster

[Exnihiloest]

Said the genius who spits on the IPCC. Ah you don't lack air!
Still passing ad hominem attacks and barely veiled insults ...

Unlike you, I share things. It is not because the IPCC is politicized, the climatology not mastered, its models itou, and therefore that we dispute the conclusions, that we will begin to condemn without nuance ALL organizations, such as scalded cats which fear cold water.
"It's official, institutional or state, so it's disinformation", that's your recurring position.

Still passing ad hominem attacks and barely veiled insults ...

I have reached your wavelength, I was sure you would like it. But we still stay away from your dirty words.

[GuyGadebois]

"It's official, institutional or state, so it's disinformation", that's your recurring position.

Pure invention.

[Exnihiloest]

"It's official, institutional or state, so it's disinformation", that's your recurring position.

Pure invention.

Just in this thread, a tendentious version of militancy while insinuating:
"UNSCEAR was established in 1955 to decree the 'Truth' of the effects of radiation."

Wikipedia version:
The United Nations Scientific Committee for the Study of the Effects of Ionizing Radiation (UNSCEAR) was created by a resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations in 1955. [...] It was created only to "precisely define the current exposure of the world's population to ionizing radiation".

[GuyGadebois]

"It's official, institutional or state, so it's disinformation", that's your recurring position.

Pure invention.

Just in this thread, a tendentious version of militancy while insinuating:
"UNSCEAR was established in 1955 to decree the 'Truth' of the effects of radiation."

It is however the truth. Nuclear, first in the hands of the military, the transparency of which is well known, then passed to civilian life has only minimized, obscured and lied to the people. It is verifiable (from the USA, Algeria, the Pacific via Russia and Japan), the data is accessible everywhere and does not come from militant organizations, but mostly scientists.

[moinsdewatt]

Fukushima: contaminated water soon to be discharged into the Pacific

BOURSORAMA WITH MEDIA SERVICES • 19/10/2020

The Japanese government should act on the solution of a discharge at sea by the end of the month, while the operation itself should not start until 2022 at the earliest, according to several local media.

It is a decision that is controversial: the Japanese government will soon formalize its decision to discharge contaminated water from the damaged Fukushima nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean, several Japanese media reported on Friday (October 16th).

"The government has not decided on the plan to follow or the moment" to announce it, however reacted the spokesman of the government Katsunobu Kato during his regular press briefing. But "we cannot postpone a decision (on this contaminated water, editor's note), in order to prevent the dismantling work of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant from being delayed," he added.

The government is expected to finalize the solution of a discharge at sea by the end of the month, while the operation itself is not expected to start until 2022 at the earliest, several local media have previously said.

1,23 million tonnes of water not free of tritium

About 1,23 million tonnes of contaminated water are currently stored in more than a thousand tanks near the nuclear power plant ravaged by the terrible tsunami of March 11, 2011 in northeastern Japan. This water comes from rain, groundwater or injections necessary to cool the cores of nuclear reactors that melted after the tsunami.

It has been filtered several times to be rid of most of its radioactive substances (radionuclides), but not tritium, which cannot be eliminated with current techniques.

With on-site storage capacities expected to reach saturation in mid-2022, the Japanese authorities have evaluated various solutions in recent years. In early 2020, experts commissioned by the government recommended dumping at sea, a practice that already exists in Japan and abroad on operating nuclear installations.

This preferred option to the detriment of other scenarios, such as evaporation in the air or sustainable storage, is particularly highly contested by the fishermen and farmers of Fukushima, fearing that this will further deteriorate the image of their products among consumers. Neighboring South Korea, which still bans the importation of seafood from the region, has also already expressed concerns about the environmental impact of such a solution.

Tritium is only dangerous to human health in very high doses, according to experts. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) also advocates the option of dilution at sea.

https://www.boursorama.com/actualite-ec ... ab6e0e940c

[Exnihiloest]

UNSCEAR is still more credible than your Dr Alex Rosen, you have to stop conspiracy theories.
On that, good night ...

Yep yes 9 years .. Can you correct Christophe steuplait?

Absolutely. UNSCEAR operates on the same model as the IPCC.
It would take a twisted mind to accept the conclusions of the IPCC and not that of UNSCEAR. But it's still very much within the realm of possibility, since the grassroots ecologist manipulates the circumstantial argument over and over again, selecting only what goes his way and denying everything else.

[Exnihiloest]

...
5 years later, the appalling record of Fukushima ...
...

March 8, 2019
Fukushima: a 15-fold risk of thyroid cancer

But how does Gadget manage to relay lies or nonsense so often? Such a bad luck, it becomes pitiful, even the statistical laws are defied.

It is confirmed today by the scientific committee of the UN:
"Zero death, no cancer: the real toll of the Fukushima nuclear accident.
The radioactive releases from the plant had no discernible health consequences, confirms an international committee of researchers, which is the benchmark."

"Published on the eve of the tragic anniversary, the 248-page report drafted by UNSCEAR, a UN scientific committee created in 1955 and operating on the same model as the IPCC for the climate, draws up a complete assessment of the health and environmental consequences of the nuclear accident that followed the tsunami. Confirming those of its previous reports, its conclusions go completely against the perception of public opinion: 55% of French people remain convinced that the radioactive fallout from the accident caused hundreds of deaths, according to the latest IRSN risk perception barometer. Reality ? They did not cause any, and no case of cancer could be, ten years later, linked to the same radioactive fallout. No impact has either been demonstrated on the environment, which was profoundly altered, on the other hand, by the pharaonic decontamination operations undertaken in the years following the accident by the Japanese authorities. "
https://www.lepoint.fr/monde/zero-mort- ... 139_24.php

Obviously there were many deaths, but not by radioactivity:
"If the radioactivity did not kill, the evacuation itself was deadly. Some 2 people, often elderly or sick, lost their lives in the operation carried out in panic and in poor sanitary conditions." ( how could an evacuation have caused so many deaths, that's what we should talk about!)

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

So there, as soon as there is such bullshit to believe, we see who comes back ...
http://www.fukushima-blog.com/

[izentrop]

It is however the truth, my good Guy

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

It is however the truth, my good Guy

Yes, because the nuclear lobby says so. Of course Izy. They would have told you that it even made people feel good that you were ready to swallow.

By dint of repetition and with the help of a good knowledge of the psyche of the people involved, it should be quite possible to prove that a square is in fact a circle. After all, what are "circle" and "square"? Simple words. And words can be shaped to make the ideas they convey unrecognizable.
Joseph Goebbels