Died of fossil fuels, nuclear and hydro

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 22/07/11, 18:38

cad? EDf manipulates people using the reflexes of people who keep impressions of a distorted graph, without rigorously checking what is written in small !!
Similar example of very effective handling all the prices in most stores, are of the type 99,90 and not 100 which looks more expensive, and very effective given its widespread use !!

I am disgusted to see people take for c ..

This lobby, like the maker of the pick, will go to court for criminal lie, when a French or English nuclear power plant will have an accident, inevitable sooner or later, irradiating and evacuating an entire region in France !!
0 x
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554




by moinsdewatt » 07/08/12, 14:39

July 12, 2012 100 dead in Nigeria. A tanker truck overturns, people rush to collect gasoline, and it catches fire.
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 07/08/12, 16:19

A hundred dead for that, it's very sad and very unfortunate ... But much less than the low dose radiation that refuses to see the WHO and the IAEA (several million in Europe and much more in Japan.) View the links above in this thread ...

And even less than air pollution in cities (1 million deaths per year, according to WHO):
http://www.vedura.fr/social/sante/deces-pollution-air
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 28/02/13, 20:26

Today: the first 2 official nuclear deaths in France:

Two dead in the fall of a nacelle at the Cattenom nuclear power plant in Lorraine
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Deaths from fossil fuels, nuclear and hydroelectric




by Obamot » 22/05/16, 18:23

In a recent press release (reminder) dating from this month, the WHO "finally" begins a timid shift in the recognition of the dangerousness of low dose irradiation! This is a first, is it the sign of the beginning of the end of its involvement with the UN agency specializing in nuclear security issues ... (?):

WHO, May 2016 wrote:Ionizing radiation: Health effects and protective measures
[...] Main facts: low doses of ionizing radiation can increase the risk of long-term effects like cancer [...]

[...] If the dose is low and / or broadcast over a long period (low dose rate), the risk is considerably lower because the probability of repairing the lesions is greater. But there is always a risk of long-term effects like cancer, which can appear years or even decades later. [...]

[...] More recently, epidemiological studies in subjects exposed in the medical context during their childhood (pediatric computed tomography) seemed to indicate that the risk of cancer could increase even at lower doses (between 50 and 100 mSv.


Source: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs371/fr/

WHO will therefore have to revise its prognosis for victims on the long-term effects of victims of nuclear disasters.
She can no longer do otherwise or back off. It is a major step forward.
Last edited by Obamot the 22 / 05 / 16, 18: 28, 1 edited once.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973

Re: Deaths from fossil fuels, nuclear and hydroelectric




by Christophe » 22/05/16, 18:27

You do well to revive this subject, I found this very nice little video: https://www.econologie.com/energie-nucle ... -aiea-oms/ : Cheesy:
0 x
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554

Re:




by moinsdewatt » 12/08/16, 23:10

Scrat wrote:
China: 21 dead in power plant explosion

The explosion was caused in the middle of the afternoon by the rupture of a pressurized steam pipe at an industrial site in the city of Dangyang, in the central province of Hubei.
An explosion today in a power plant in central China left at least 21 people dead and five injured, three of them seriously affected, the China News Agency reported, citing local authorities.


http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2016/ ... trique.php



It's in a coal plant.

........ Chinese news websites have reported that the company operating the coal-fired power plant also included electricity generation .......


http://www.20minutes.fr/monde/1907639-2 ... electrique
0 x
moinsdewatt
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5111
Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
Location: Isére
x 554

Re: Re:




by moinsdewatt » 12/08/16, 23:10

Coal is the energy that kills the most per Terawatt hour produced.

Just this day in Nextbigfuture:

http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2016/08/un ... s-are.html

Death rate energy.png
Death rate energy.png (29.54 KB) Viewed 3429 times
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Deaths from fossil fuels, nuclear and hydroelectric




by Obamot » 13/08/16, 03:52

1) The article does not indicate its source.

2) The author does not decline his curriculum vitae ...

3) Ah, well, then ... I never thought that we had to add a part of the deaths from coal on nuclear (second degree mode "OFF"). At least for the uranium which is enriched thanks to ... coal power plants!

4) Then, the one who laid down these stats, surely did not weight the figures with the victims of low dose irradiation (UNSCAR now recognizes> 1mios for Chernobyl, to which we must add Fukushima with the Tokyo population basin at 60km, it will surely climb to 3 or 4 million over a century, the WHO has just admitted pathologies relating to this recently last year ... see my post above)

mwouais therefore all these figures on the nuclear power, must be false.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973

Re: Deaths from fossil fuels, nuclear and hydroelectric




by Christophe » 16/08/16, 00:45

+1 with Obamot ... no but without messing around ???

Solar PV would kill 0.44 / 0.04 = 11 times more than nuclear?
She is really nice :) :)

What are the causes ???

Roof fall? Blow of juice? Accidents in the factory? : Mrgreen:

Same remark for ... peat ??? Who remains, in my opinion, quite anecdotal and should be included in biomass, right?
0 x

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 282 guests