Died of fossil fuels, nuclear and hydro

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79325
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11044




by Christophe » 22/07/11, 12:22

In this case, a lot of your messages will also go to the dumpster ...

I remind you of the basic rules of forums: https://www.econologie.com/forums/regles-des ... t2194.html in bold what concerns you

The rules:

1. Posts containing hateful or defamatory because of opinions, origin, ethnicity, social, religious, political, gender or sexual orientation at the location of the participants or the public will not be tolerated.
2. No free or abusive personal attacks.
3. Not "spam" or profit except advertising agreements with moderation.
4. Political propaganda, religious or ideological is not allowed. By propaganda, we mean the aggressive repetition of messages intended to convert one or more people to the principles conveyed by the sender without stimulating discussion.
5. Pornographic images or offensive by abusive or hateful are prohibited.


And about dedeleco, case to which you allude in the MP, I have already called it to order more than once and I have moderated several of these messages ... none of the wishes to my knowledge (except functional addition) !!

Take a look at the Academy report ...
0 x
pb2488
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 837
Registration: 17/08/09, 13:04




by pb2488 » 22/07/11, 12:37

Christophe wrote:In this case, a lot of your messages will also go to the dumpster ...
You laugh? Tell me which ones are out of the rules, I would modify them myself if necessary.

Christophe wrote:And about dedeleco, case to which you allude in the MP, I have already called it to order more than once and I have moderated several of these messages ... none of the wishes to my knowledge (except functional addition) !!
And there, is there anything that appeals to you? It contradicts what you say above.

Christophe wrote:Take a look at the Academy report ...
Ok
0 x
"The truth can not be defined as the majority opinion:
The truth is what follows from the observation of facts. "
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79325
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11044




by Christophe » 22/07/11, 13:36

pb2488 wrote:It contradicts what you say above.


In what way? : Shock:
0 x
pb2488
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 837
Registration: 17/08/09, 13:04




by pb2488 » 22/07/11, 14:18

Christophe wrote:
pb2488 wrote:It contradicts what you say above.

In what way? : Shock:
You say that a lot of my messages must go to the dumpster because supposedly outside the rules (it makes me laugh when I read the rules and the messages of some) and then you say that you never needed to unlike others.
Should know.
Finally let me go.

On any other forum, none of my posts would be problematic (These are just views, arguments and articles). However, on any other forum, an attitude like Obamot's would have been immediately sanctioned and his publicly moderated messages. You, you have deleted everything and therefore hidden his "delirium" as you named it.
The guy wants text and publicly that I have my picture "demolished" (among other things) just because I don't think like him and you keep it in your forum under the pretext of what? that he is a big contributor and that he is of general opinion ....? I do not know if you realize ... This is not the idea that I have the necessary modo, impartial and neutral.

I may not be of the general opinion of the forum (and so ???) but at least I am neither aggressive nor insulting towards those who just don't think like me.
I hope that composure will silence me the day people like this are in power (it will happen soon).
Cdlt

ps: you will surely accuse me of having sought the "confrontation", finally, reread above, who was aggressive?
0 x
"The truth can not be defined as the majority opinion:

The truth is what follows from the observation of facts. "
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79325
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11044




by Christophe » 22/07/11, 14:26

pb2488 wrote:You say that a lot of my messages must go to the dumpster because supposedly outside the rules (it makes me laugh when I read the rules and the messages of some) and then you say that you never needed to unlike others.
Should know.

It was not a question of need but of tolerance!

pb2488 wrote:Finally let me go.


+1

pb2488 wrote:On any other forum, none of my posts would be problematic (These are just views, arguments and articles). However, on any other forum, an attitude like that of Obamot would have been immediately sanctioned and his messages publicly moderate.


-1 don't give up ...

It was moderated ... if you count on your behavior so that I leave insults on this forum you dream...

With regard to "behavior lessons on a forum"I remind you of this subject of 2009 which is entirely dedicated to you !! https://www.econologie.com/forums/pb2487-va- ... t8187.html all in finesse ...

Remind us to see why I closed your pb2487 account?

Your attitude has not really changed since 2009, you just "refined" your rotting techniques ...
0 x
pb2488
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 837
Registration: 17/08/09, 13:04




by pb2488 » 22/07/11, 16:20

Christophe wrote:It was moderated ... if you count on your behavior so that I leave insults on this forum you dream...
Deleting insults is normal, it's your job in modo but why delete the messages entirely (normally, a small "moderate cause insult" instead of the insult in the message would be more than enough and seems more logical to me, unless you want to cover someone up) and especially why have you deleted your warning message?

Christophe wrote:Remind us to see why I closed your pb2487 account?
For the same reasons that you would re-close it today: Divergence of opinions ... What you, you call "rotting".
For me, rotting is insults and personal attacks. Do not show that you punish them and protect those who post them ... I find it biased from a modo. Finally, it's your forum you do as you want, this is only my opinion.
Cdlt
Last edited by pb2488 the 22 / 07 / 11, 16: 56, 1 edited once.
0 x
"The truth can not be defined as the majority opinion:

The truth is what follows from the observation of facts. "
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79325
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11044




by Christophe » 22/07/11, 16:32

I deleted it because it brought nothing to the debate of idea and only concerned Obamot, you and me. Just as I will delete these posts when we are finished talking about your behavior ...

Research and assimilates stp the definition of troll on a forum... the systematic difference of opinion (vis-à-vis some, not me, sometimes we agree) it's not far from rotting ...

I didn't ban you at the time for nothing ... and I said: you refined your "technique" ...

Yes a good modo is impartial as much as possible, good slip ... : Cheesy:

ps: I don't see all the insults, assaults or muscular exchange either ... especially if we don't say it ...

reps: your opinion on this: https://www.econologie.com/forums/publicite- ... 10975.html ?
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 22/07/11, 16:44

An honest dialogue supposes answers to basic questions asked like this one asked for months without valid scientific answer:
Finally Pb2488 representative of the manipulative nuclear lobby never answers my specific questions:
Quote:
I would like that pb2488 and behind him, the manipulative and liar nuclear lobby, deign to get excited to explain to me how to 300mSieverts a year you can survive 30 years with a dose of 9 Sievert while the third surely kills !


Such repeated claims of 100 to 300m Safe and Undocumented Sieverts are criminal claims.


Pb2488 knows his nuclear buddies well, to the point of knowing their life and their number of children, etc.


So this Jancovici and the others in the lobby have been teaching for 80 years that:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPCxewpz ... re=related
Below 200milliSieverts per year no documented effect on health !!


In 10 years it is a dose of 2 Sieverts and 30 years a dose of 6 Sieverts deadly for sure, destroying the immune system with all kinds of diseases, the whole body déglinglé with the molecules cut into small pieces, not only cancers,
such as: https://www.econologie.com/forums/post201232.html#201232
that this nuclear lobby has the nerve to rank in psychic illnesses for fear of nuclear power, suppressing all the deaths of Chernobyl:
!!
Image


It is proven by lots of scientific studies that doses accumulate over a lifetime, on the local treatments of cancers by irradiation (which multiply the risks of other cancers), even while walking under the UV of the sun a little too much, like the farmers, masons, vacationers, doctors, surgeons who operate under radiation and have cancer, and die from it (like the surgeon's father from husband to sister to my wife) !!
Just a single damaged cell, to have cancer, and the cells are not all eliminated, otherwise we would never have cancer!
Addrelyn should live in this safe radioactivity of 9 Sieverts in 30 years and see if his body repairs or eliminates without cancers !!
For much less than that, the great scientists Curies, Fermi sacrificed their lives by dying well before !!

We are referring to Hiroshima, never to doctors and surgeons irradiated by radioscopy, dead in very large numbers long after Hiroshima, never to the many deaths from cancers induced further by radiation anti-cancer treatments, all of which have been very little studied to avoid highlighting the horrible truth, doses below 200 or 300mSv / year kill very well !! !!


This lobby continues to lie, to abuse, to deceive, with false studies distorted, unverifiable (on Hiroshima and not on Chernobyl), made by the lobby, read the story outside the lobby of those specialists, scared to discover the extent of lies and manipulations, which are stifled !!

I repeat, as for the Mediator (same lobby mechanism that infiltrates and controls everything), after a Fukushima-Chernobyl-type accident, in France and England inevitable, because infallibility is impossible, this huge manipulation by the French nuclear lobby, will bring those responsible to justice for manipulation and criminal deception !!

There is a serious underestimation of the dangers of radiation, the risk of earthquakes, the risk of tsunamis, the real risks of accidents, the consequences of irradiation on nuclear workers, exposed to radiation and despised by those who use them. control at high level and avoid them radiations ..
0 x
pb2488
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 837
Registration: 17/08/09, 13:04




by pb2488 » 22/07/11, 16:51

Christophe wrote:I deleted it because it brought nothing to the debate of idea and only concerned Obamot, you and me. Just as I will delete these posts when we are finished talking about your behavior ...
Like that, we are sure that there will be no trace of the lead of some ...
But if you are going to delete what brings nothing to the idea debate, why did you keep this subject:
https://www.econologie.com/forums/pb2487-va- ... t8187.html

Christophe wrote:Yes a good modo is impartial as much as possible, good slip ... : Cheesy:
It happens: Partial, I meant ... I correct.

Christophe wrote:ps: I don't see all the insults, assaults or muscular exchange either ... especially if we don't say it ...
You say it via MP, isn't that what you call "crying au modo"?
0 x
"The truth can not be defined as the majority opinion:

The truth is what follows from the observation of facts. "
pb2488
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 837
Registration: 17/08/09, 13:04




by pb2488 » 22/07/11, 17:27

Christophe wrote:reps: your opinion on this: https://www.econologie.com/forums/publicite- ... 10975.html ?

ie?
0 x
"The truth can not be defined as the majority opinion:

The truth is what follows from the observation of facts. "

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 402 guests