pb2488 wrote:Who wrote this document? an anti-nuclear website?
yes, by people who have no children, moreover!
Did67 wrote:Being a father or grandfather does not protect you from taking reckless risks: how many fathers or grandfathers take the wheel completely drunk ???
pb2488 wrote:They are surely dishonest and have no mood to endanger their family ...
This is also why they defend the climate ....
(Purchased by the nuclear lobby, but not by the oil lobby .... find the error?)
Edit: available in full on Youtube (for how long?) In 4 parts:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnQG-DJW7lk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb9McK6zClg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSSBb0cnR30
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQoMptl5Z54
Quote these messages publicly, rather than comment on them.Christophe wrote:And that is why I will not respond to your private messages requesting an explanation ..."I am a poor victim, I come to cry at the modo".
There, for me, it is a disturbing element because scientific and consensual, at least for this academy.Christophe wrote:The NY Academy of Sciences, which is not anti nuclear (if?), Speaks of a figure of 1 million deaths over 20 years following Chernobyl: https://www.econologie.com/tchernobyl-un ... -4351.html
pb2488 wrote:There, for me, it is a disturbing element because scientific and consensual, at least for this academy.
To see.
Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 279 guests