Hello everyone
while surfing the net I met guys who show a method that seems so simple to build a Hydrogen generator !! .....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJNCaLbERI0
my questions are: 1- is there no risk in case of HH leak ??
2- the plates must be made of stainless steel or any other material ??
2- is it easy to get into a car?
3- if it works well, which is best to lower consumption; a Hydrogen generator, or a Pantone Kit ??
Please read and write in advance
Create a Hydrogen Generator
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
You can read with interest:
https://www.econologie.com/forums/electrolys ... t1228.html
it will go quickly, there are only 515 pages
In conclusion:
on our small European cars, the production of gas that would allow the energy available on board is insufficient to obtain a significant result, unless you succeed in manufacturing a Meyer electrolyser. If so, keep your secret and you will make a fortune
https://www.econologie.com/forums/electrolys ... t1228.html
it will go quickly, there are only 515 pages
In conclusion:
on our small European cars, the production of gas that would allow the energy available on board is insufficient to obtain a significant result, unless you succeed in manufacturing a Meyer electrolyser. If so, keep your secret and you will make a fortune
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
Tips for creating "new" energies have been found quite a bit on the left and on the right. Like this hydrogen generator. Or even the free energy generated with magnets thus turning a turbine without motor or nothing and constantly ... Etc ....
Yes it's good.
Yes it works.
But as soon as it is a question of putting these systems to the dimension of real need there it is quite another thing.
Yes it's good.
Yes it works.
But as soon as it is a question of putting these systems to the dimension of real need there it is quite another thing.
0 x
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
Razputin wrote:
Ah ????? Nice to learn it! You haven't been following this kind of subject for a long time or do you have proof? One buys !
Or even the free energy generated with magnets thus turning a turbine without motor or nothing and constantly ... Etc ....
Yes it's good.
Yes it works.
Ah ????? Nice to learn it! You haven't been following this kind of subject for a long time or do you have proof? One buys !
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
Fits for example here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxkMwNFEm9o
By doing some google / youtube research you find plenty. So be careful when I say 'turbines' I get a little carried away. In fact the principle is to create a perpetual energy, without spending it. The two magnets turn a 'turbine' generating energy.
But the problem always comes back to the same: the energy released is low and there is nothing to use it for big things. It's nice in the experience, less in its real use.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxkMwNFEm9o
By doing some google / youtube research you find plenty. So be careful when I say 'turbines' I get a little carried away. In fact the principle is to create a perpetual energy, without spending it. The two magnets turn a 'turbine' generating energy.
But the problem always comes back to the same: the energy released is low and there is nothing to use it for big things. It's nice in the experience, less in its real use.
0 x
Bah after placing two magnets and spinning a wheel between two thanks to the magnetic fields, in principle even a child can do it. The wheel will spin. And if it turns, like a mill, it generates energy.
But like I say ... low energy. I can't imagine using this same principle to generate the energy necessary to run a car or heat a house.
But like I say ... low energy. I can't imagine using this same principle to generate the energy necessary to run a car or heat a house.
0 x
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
Ah, Minato! you chose wrong. warm, and wind.
Since time, if it worked it would be known. At the time (around 2006) I even asked my son's girlfriend (Japanese pure juice) to do a search in Japanese on a Japanese window. Nothing other than these famous 40.000 fans. Not even a way to find out which store chain bought and sold them. Not even a trace of someone who was happy or unhappy with it.
Perendev engine: same story: he would have set up a workshop in the Czech Republic. Have you heard of it since?
Tariel Kapanadze: Jean Louis Naudin tried to make one, until he bought a good power meter ...
The only hopeful thing, although there are still many skeptics (including me who has been following the subject since the beginning in January 2011) is the e-cat and its derivatives (Celani, Brillouin, Defkalion)
( https://www.econologie.com/forums/reaction-d ... 4-820.html )
The difference here is that very serious people (MIT teacher, former Nobel laureate, university pros) dare to take an interest in it publicly and that millions of dollars have been invested. But this is not a "perpetual motion" but an exploration of a poorly known state of matter (to put it simply)
Since time, if it worked it would be known. At the time (around 2006) I even asked my son's girlfriend (Japanese pure juice) to do a search in Japanese on a Japanese window. Nothing other than these famous 40.000 fans. Not even a way to find out which store chain bought and sold them. Not even a trace of someone who was happy or unhappy with it.
Perendev engine: same story: he would have set up a workshop in the Czech Republic. Have you heard of it since?
Tariel Kapanadze: Jean Louis Naudin tried to make one, until he bought a good power meter ...
The only hopeful thing, although there are still many skeptics (including me who has been following the subject since the beginning in January 2011) is the e-cat and its derivatives (Celani, Brillouin, Defkalion)
( https://www.econologie.com/forums/reaction-d ... 4-820.html )
The difference here is that very serious people (MIT teacher, former Nobel laureate, university pros) dare to take an interest in it publicly and that millions of dollars have been invested. But this is not a "perpetual motion" but an exploration of a poorly known state of matter (to put it simply)
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
The other concern with these "new sources of energy" is that they are not necessarily welcome. The major powers managing the energies already present (petroleum, nuclear, etc.) do not really appreciate the arrival of competitors. And I think, will do all they can to get them as late as possible ...
0 x
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
It is a fact and there is no shortage of singers in the theory of the complete.
But there are other problems.
1) Apparently, no Grail finder is a volunteer.
2) most make a prototype, then seek funds or sell a patent, often without success.
3) and nobody tries to sell one, then two, then four. sorry, if, it works, it gets to know each other.
4) and apparently always, when someone publishes a patent (like Andrea Rossi and Stephen Meyer, for example), it's like a soup recipe: we give you the shape of the pot, the list of vegetables, forgetting to give that of spices!
But there are other problems.
1) Apparently, no Grail finder is a volunteer.
2) most make a prototype, then seek funds or sell a patent, often without success.
3) and nobody tries to sell one, then two, then four. sorry, if, it works, it gets to know each other.
4) and apparently always, when someone publishes a patent (like Andrea Rossi and Stephen Meyer, for example), it's like a soup recipe: we give you the shape of the pot, the list of vegetables, forgetting to give that of spices!
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 479 guests