wirbelwind262 wrote:the wishes of manu:
And Happy New Year to all !
Many reactions on the net are similar to yours ....
Does this mean that you feel in opposition to the current president?
wirbelwind262 wrote:the wishes of manu:
And Happy New Year to all !
Allegations of underestimation of wealth
In its edition of May 31, 2016, Le Canard enchaîné states that Emmanuel Macron undervalues his assets by € 253 compared to the assessment made by the tax administration, which verifies the declarations made to the High Authority for the transparency in public life (HATVP) 255. This undervaluation concerns the value of his house in Le Touquet, which the interested party claims to have had appraised in 504 by an expert with the Court of Cassation who would have assessed it 2012 €, whereas the tax authorities consider that 'it is worth € 1. This reassessment by the tax administration raises the wealth of the Macron spouses mechanically above the tax threshold for solidarity wealth tax (ISF), resulting in a tax delay of € 200 for 000 and € 1 for 453.
Ahmed wrote:@ Nico239: Of course, the traditional institutions have the vocation to last, but what is happening is played out on two apparently contradictory planes: 1- on the one hand, a call is expressed to these institutions so that they influence their action.
2- on the other hand, there is a desire to empower the GJ movement.
The first point is understandable because of the Jacobin tradition which strongly centralizes power and it is difficult to ignore it when it comes to blocking decisions that directly impact daily life.
The second rejects the electoral game as well as the other intermediate bodies (like the unions) and intends to constitute a force independent of the classic games of power, either by influencing it, or by finding other political ways of acting actually. more democratic, which would bypass the oligarchic power.
The opposition between these two planes is therefore rather chronological and should diminish and, perhaps, disappear ...
wirbelwind262 wrote:Barely HAHAHA you would have thought you were in the middle of a sermon ...
It is a description of the forces present ok so what?
IF the opposition disappears and what do you think would result?
Ahmed wrote:In any case, the existence of an authentic dialogue will allow these internal tensions to be expressed, which is already a good step towards appeasement.
Remundo wrote:I think that the debate with the GJs is entirely pipé by the government.
the migration issue has been excluded, and the RIC will never be conceded.
they seek to save time, to give wages which are not, hope that it will get tired in the street ... We wait for July, we spend the summer cuffy (the ideal time to stick unfair laws) , and then September, and then almost January 2020, we tap in the media, while we collect his good little wages and we will take his generous retirement from parliamentarian after.
Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 189 guests