chatelot16 wrote:I keep all the old stuff in working order because I think that with simplified version of linux it can still be used for a long time
It's not just with the old thing that we waste time: I bought a new laptop with Vista, which I couldn't stand, nothing worked properly ... it was a real pain to find the right driver to put XP
With a simplified version of Linux you can hardly do anything these days ... and a high-performance version requires exactly the same configuration as Vista / win7 ...
At the start of Win Vista, supposedly "compatible" machines were sold, but which in fact were not at all: not enough memory (you need 2GB to use it correctly), single-core processor ( you need a minimum double core to have perfs compatible with current applications), graphics card unable to display the 3D desktop, the whole gives a shitty machine that is lagging ...
But with a dual core processor even if not a lightning war, 2GB of ram and a good CG, Vista works ~ as well as Win 7, I experienced it with the following configuration: A64 4400X2 processor, CG Ati X800XL, 2GB of ram, everything runs wonderfully and was able to run recent games very well ...
The only thing I disabled under Vista is file indexing, useless for my use, otherwise nothing ...
When it comes to bad sector problems, in 15 years of computing I have NEVER had a bad sector on any of my hard drives (apart from a new defective original one that was replaced immediately), maybe because I only chose quality HDDs on my "home assembly and config" machines, my current disk being a Western digital Raptor 74GB, the raptor / velociraptor being professional range disks derived from SCSI, expensive, a little noisy, but indestructible ...
As for windows crashes, sometimes it is about hardware problems (I have seen several cases): poor quality memory coming in # 1 ...