sen-no-sen wrote:izentrop wrote:
"And yet, faced with our non-action towards climate change, artificialization remains the only way out for the survival of humanity".
This is exactly what AW Gross explains: technology is creating a web around us, and long before it is able to emancipate itself from the human it will have enslaved us ...
It reverses the role:
Technology has made life comfortable for a growing part of humanity since the industrial era ...
But in the 70s, in high places we already knew that we lived in a land with limits ... Instead, "we" blindly played always more.
It's the man and his egocentrism the problem, not the technology.
Example to feed the planet, roughly:
Today, even if we stop burning fossils, the overflow of CO2 in the atmosphere will make agriculture more and more difficult (in our regions: increasingly dry summers, more and more rainy winter ), dependent on a growing technology to be able to continue to produce ... permaculture and bio have not proved their effectiveness.
sen-no-sen wrote:the changes being too fast we will now have to readapt ourselves through technology, even if it means getting it back into our body.
They are too fast for biodiversity. Olivier Barau says it: man leaves no room for life on earth. We have the solutions, just leave a small part of the territory, wildlife areas in corridors where the man would not have the right to set foot there, not even a hunter, a walker or a chainsaw . Only one place is like this: Chernobyl.
Should we wish for a nuclear war to get there?
When the glaciers have melted, many valleys will have dramatic periods without water. We see more and more temperatures exceeding the 40 °, temperature or photosynthesis no longer works, dixit Dominique Bourg.
sen-no-sen wrote: this rehabilitation will soon be out of reach of our only genes
It's not a problem, technology can work miracles.