Rajqawee wrote:Let's be careful though. This is not impossible, even without electronic "fraud".
the figures remain small, at the scale of the RS. Philippot has a little visibility, but it suffices that it has been shared on an FB page or a high-visibility twitter, acquired by a population favorable to measures to obtain the 28kvotes with a completely reversed trend.
It would be "bad luck" to have had visibility only with this small piece of Internet very oriented (conversely), but not impossible despite everything.
Totally agree. It all depends on the sites where the advertisement was made for this vote.
When we know so little about a subject, when we do not know the "prospect" of this vote, nor the history of the publicity that has been made of it and which will bring people from different currents at different times, than the number of voters is low, that we have no detailed evidence, and that we speak of "manipulation", it is childish, not to say frankly stupid, and typical of conspiratorial rantings.
Such a survey cannot be meaningful. To take its insignificance for manipulation is ridiculous, or at the very least, premature.