Facebook and Google: fine robotic psychologists!

[Christophe]

I added Google in the title because it's kif kif joke!

Facebook is better than your loved ones to describe your personality

A British study published Monday in the United States tends to prove that some sites like Facebook can better understand the personality of a person than his relatives.

Facebook knows you well. A study from Cambridge University, UK, and Stanford, California, whose work was published Monday in the Proceedings of the American Academy of Sciences (PNAS), explains that Specialized computer programs, including the American social network, are better at decrypting the personality of a surfer than the family and friends of the person.

"For this research, a computer was more insightful in predicting a subject's personality than his co-workers or family members by analyzing only ten 'likes'," reports Challenges.fr.

(...)

http://www.planet.fr/high-tech-facebook ... .1506.html

All this falls on the pile in the doctrine of population control ...

Ah the golden age of the web, free, is well buried ... but the fight is still possible!

[thibr]

Disinformation campaigns have invaded all influential social networks, as all kinds of entities have huge incentives to pollute or bias public opinion. This is what makes social media dangerous.

[moinsdewatt]

I'm not on Facebook.

[Obamot]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utWMGi8HTjY
Disinformation campaigns have invaded all influential social networks, as all kinds of entities have huge incentives to pollute or bias public opinion. This is what makes social media dangerous.

You put a piece back in the bastringue We will soon call you Pedro N ° 2.

NO we are talking about FaceBook, Google, YouTube here ... NOT RUSSIANS !!!

What he says is quite true, except for the fact that the “troll factories” who tip the scales are much more often in Israel (or even the USA) than in Russia, where the level of English (or of French, or even other languages) is medium-medium or even non-existent. In addition, the US investigations accusing the Russians have hardly yielded anything.

We saw it during the Syrian war from 2011 to 2014, during which the Americans and pro-Zionist circles (who no longer even hide it) recruited jihadists. and equipped them (TOW missiles, pickups etc) on the sly via social networks (and also Saudi Arabia in the Arab world) we remember the famous scandal unveiled by ex-FBI agent Mike German, who sold the fuse. . (against the background of the 9/11 case) even if the executor for the bulk of the affair was often Israel for this part of the globe, and these troll factories received / receive funding from Soros (personally, the great master of the computer world being Bill Gates, I cannot imagine that he did not have a role to play, when we see what is happening with vaccines, I close the parenthesis ).

Since 2015 there has been an explosion in the presence of trolls on social networks, factory trolls have moved from the artisanal stage to the industrial stage, with the development of “bots” which have automated certain participations (especially in cats) . So six years ago, real hordes of trolls surged and some groups were unmasked. And since they did not support Russia, it became obvious where they came from.

As well as the flood of certain members here, at the “micro” scale who support the industry and are suspected of lobbying, if so they are not on the left and do not support Russia ...

[Exnihiloest]

...
What he says is quite true, except for the fact that the “troll factories” who tip the scales are much more often in Israel (or even the USA) than in Russia, where the level of English (or of French, even other languages) is medium-medium or even non-existent ...

This is what the “troll factories” want us to believe. Yet it is well known that for years, Putin has used armies of small hands to sing his praises on social networks.

But there is worse as a "danger of death" than social networks and their manipulation or instrumentalization. It would be their prohibition or their control by the states, including by instances which would be supposed to be neutral and would filter. But with the fight against conspiratorial sites, we take the path, and we risk ending up having an official truth where only the sites stamped "VVV" (true truth validated) by a few state pharmacies will have the right to visit.

To end with a comment on the video, a pity that the speaker at one point uses a conspiracy thesis: "if we did not notice a disinformation campaign coming from France, it is because it would have been more clever than others... ". This is exactly the kind of message that can manipulate public opinion, when in fact there is no evidence to support it. So beware of danger, but also beware of danger when you are told to be careful. danger !

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

...
What he says is quite true, except for the fact that the “troll factories” who tip the scales are much more often in Israel (or even the USA) than in Russia, where the level of English (or of French, even other languages) is medium-medium or even non-existent ...

This is what the “troll factories” want us to believe. Yet it is well known that for years, Putin has used armies of small hands to sing his praises on social networks.

Like Trump, like Macron (etc, etc), like GAFAS, like multinationals ... you yourself are a small hand of GMO lobbies, transhumanists, ultra-liberals, climate deniers, atomists, and so on. What else?

[Obamot]

More there is worse as a "danger of death" than social networks and their manipulation or instrumentalization. It would be their prohibition or their control by the states, including by instances which would be supposed to be neutral and would filter. But with the fight against conspiracy sites, we take the path, and we risk ending up having an official truth

!!! XKeyscore!!!

You've 'dream', the NSA did it! (so I'm not going to contradict you ...)
Because it's been a while since these social networks provide the NSA with their data, legally or not.
this is precisely what we had also discovered at the time!

Wiretapping scandal. Emails, chats and social networks: the NSA spies on everything
International mail 2013/08/01
https://www.courrierinternational.com/u ... ionne-tout

Internet privacy: NSA revelations spark heated debate on social media
European Parliament on 09-10-2013 - 13:41
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/fr/ ... ux-sociaux

The NSA can know almost everything about an Internet user
Thanks to the XKeyscore program, US intelligence is able to monitor emails, searches or social media activity for a given target in real time, reveals The Guardian.
Le Figaro: 01/08/2013 at 08:40, https://www.lefigaro.fr/international/2 ... rnaute.php

We remember that even the cellphones of European leaders were being spied on!
The USA had said they were stopping, but it is still going strong of course!

[Christophe]

Yeah, everything is rotten to sum up!

Except econology!



Ah if there are still some rotten here ...

[Exnihiloest]

... you yourself are a small hand of GMO lobbies, transhumanists, ultra-liberals, climate negationists, atomists, and so on. What else?

Arguments ad personam.
I wonder why pit bull growls aren't subdued. Do they do the babysitting?

[Exnihiloest]

...
Because it's been a while since these social networks provide the NSA with their data, legally or not.
this is precisely what we had also discovered at the time![/color]
...

There's nothing wrong with mining public data, including if it's the NSA, it's the people who publish it. If they don't want it to be public, then don't publish! But most do not care, especially among young people, and I understand them.

Where the shoe pinches and I join you, it is on the hacking of private data which is not supposed to be accessible, in particular by the installation of cookies on the PC or the smartphones. There it is intolerable.
Regarding PCs, a downside, however: many of these cookies come from the installation of cracked software. The hacker who installs a cracked version of Acrobat or Windows and then gets hacked, does not have to complain afterwards, it is his own game. I play it, I have paid for it from time to time, and I'm not complaining. We must also assume the risks we take (including when we give personal information in a discussion of forum).