Facebook and Apple want to freeze eggs

[Christophe]

But how far will we go

I do not know ... but it's not the world I want for my children!

[Obamot]

Yes, there we touch the bottom.

What is incredible is that these are companies from the ultraliberal world, which absolutely do not hesitate to wallow on respect for the private sphere. Moreover with the NSA, this sacrosanct ultimate refuge would no longer exist ...! And the Zuckerberg, he should be well to ask his family Rabbi if freezing eggs would be allowed by the practice of watered down Judaism ...?!? There would be real reasons to meditate in front of the wailing wall: what a beautiful hypocrisy the mediatization of these images of bows supposed to represent the practice of a faith that would be immaculate in authenticity! Let us hope that there are still sincere pupils among them ... But alas, we see here and there what is the danger of a world where everything is stigmatized, and possibly of seeing the points where the limits of religious doctrine ( or theoretical models whatever) would be achieved by the very ones who are supposed to represent a "social example"for the younger generations!

These people have no principle other than to make a maximum of money at the potential detriment of their collaborators and even of the users of their "products" (in their logic of programmed obsolescence, which they apply to humans, hence my previous reference to the Nazis): and after being astonished at the enlistment of suburbanites in jihadi $ me to find a "ground of challenge" - in the face of a world which exceeds them and against which they do not 'no longer have any answer (nor do they have any excuse / s for their abuses) but this is another subject which nevertheless shows the seriousness of the problem and its magnitude - and to go to fight in Iraq or in Syria. there is only one step in a civilization which has lost the meaning and especially the practice of "good ethical values", the one that every citizen should apply to himself as much as to others of which he should to take care...!



When will surrogate mothers recruited and paid by your company!?! Because "volunteering" at this point ...

[sen-no-sen]

As for Tom Cook it's folded: for the new big boss of Apple, well it's really not his problem:

Oh yes!
All the propaganda around the defense of gay rights is only a huge screen of smoke put in place by the system.
Since homosexual couples can not have children by definition, they will allow the emergence of a new sector that would have been difficult if not impossible to raise:ectogenesis, that is to say the gestation outside the body, finality of the techno-scientist process.
Currently, infertile couples (straight or gay) increasingly resort to surrogate mothers, mostly from third world countries, but this archaic process does not solve the problem of the "missing" egg or sperm in women. homosexual couples.
It is for this reason that research on parthenogenesis will allow women to have sperm-free girls, and ultimately, to allow male couples to have children in their images via cells taken from them. and grown through an artificial uterus and 3d printer ...



This is why the propaganda around gay marriage is so strong, not because of the defense of the social interests of the latter, but because of the idea of ​​a juicy business, allowing through a pseudo-humanism to make people accept the most abject project that has been allowed to imagine ....

http://www.sciencesetavenir.fr/sante/20140922.OBS9931/fiv-un-embryon-humain-reproduit-par-impression-3d.html

Sciences> Health> World first: a 3D printed embryo for successful IVF
World's first: an embryo printed in 3D to succeed IVF

[Obamot]

You take away the words of the ... mouth!

This is precisely why I was "salary."gay marriage. Not out of ideology (I have nothing to do with it), since it already existed in the form of a PACS, so there was therefore no reason to" extend "this prerogative further towards illegitimate rights, without these intruding ... interfering ... with the legitimate rights of others, which in the end was not lacking ... Because the kids (which they are becoming or not) we do not ask their opinion ... We would therefore do well, by wisdom, to leave this choice "to nature", right?

Because according to one of the fundamental principles (still in force), we should not put ourselves in a situation to decide for others: we might as well apply it to gametes ...

[Christophe]

Soon the November 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jo-bTUDFnbY

[Obamot]

Press release, received this morning at the editorial office

Although I do not have the IOs in the odor of holiness, this text shows why the initiative of Apple and Facebook admin goes against any "social integration" of workers and their "need for accomplishment" in their family life AS MUCH as professional. We can only deduce that the "is the international treasure "Facebook tries asocial practices with its own employees and this just as much as Apple elsewhere (and if at all possible, punishable by law ...)

ILO study
Maternity protection: beneficial for workers and for small businesses

Maternity protection and measures to reconcile work and family life can have positive effects for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), according to Laura Addati, an ILO specialist.
Editorial | 20 October 2014

Laura Addati, ILO Maternity Protection and Work-Family Specialist
GENEVA - For most people, having a child is a happy and stimulating event. But let's be honest, this can be a source of discrimination against women.

Take the example of Noemi, a young woman of 26, whose contract was not renewed when she told her employer that she was pregnant. The loss of her job, especially in this time of economic recession, has had a significant impact on household income and mental health.

The story of Noemi is unfortunately all too common. Maternity protection is still often perceived as a financial burden that undermines the competitiveness of businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Reasons can explain it. An ILO report on maternity and paternity at work, published last May, shows that 25 percent of the 185 countries surveyed still have laws making it mandatory for individual employers to finance all cash benefits related to the leave. maternity. In 16 other percent of the countries, employers only pay part of the maternity benefits.

Secondly, in some countries the regulation exempts SMEs from enforcing maternity protection rights. This is based on the presumption that they can not afford to pay.

The perception of motherhood as a cost to business is further reinforced by cultural norms that the ideal worker should be available 24 hours on 24, 7 days on 7, and that women's commitment to work declines when they are pregnant or become mothers.

Benefits for both parties

A new study led by ILO departments of Working Conditions and Equality and Enterprise, conducted by the UK's Middlesex University - Maternity Protection in SMEs: An International Review (Maternity Protection in SMEs : international review) - argues that maternity protection is not only feasible for SMEs, but that it can be beneficial for both business and society as a whole. This is important since women make up a significant proportion of the SME workforce, especially in the service sector.

The benefits of maternity protection are multiple and are even more pronounced in companies that work with a small number of employees. For example, with adequate maternity protection measures and measures to reconcile work and family life, staff members of these companies tend to stay in the same company, saving on recruitment costs. . Absenteeism is also reduced as employees feel more motivated and involved.

But for parenthood to become "a normal part of business life", we need new policies that take into account the specific characteristics and needs of SMEs. In particular, these regulations should include national laws and policies that protect maternity and promote a balance between work and family life at no or minimal cost to employers, and include targeted support measures.

How to proceed?

First, it is crucial that maternity leave be financed by compulsory social insurance or public funds. A few years ago, SMEs in Australia and California expressed particular reservations about the cost of new maternity regulations. However, a few years after the entry into force of the legislation, a majority of employers are satisfied.

Even when maternity benefits are financed by social insurance, this does not mean that they are financially neutral for employers. Financial assistance and other incentives could be particularly helpful for small companies. This is the case, for example, when occupational risk assessment requires pregnant workers to have additional paid leave because of health and safety issues - and for the cost of recruiting and training women in pregnancy. a new employee. In Mexico, the government subsidizes maternity insurance in addition to employee and employer contributions. This is a good way to protect low-income employees as well as SME employers.

Governments could also help SMEs to cope with indirect costs by simplifying administrative procedures or helping them manage cash shortfalls when benefits are subsequently reimbursed by the state or social security. For example, in the United Kingdom, small businesses deduct mandatory maternity benefits from their taxes. When taxes are lower than cash benefits, companies can apply for early funding of maternity benefits. In addition, medium and large employers may claim 92 as public pay for one per cent of their employees' wages, while small employers are entitled to 103 per cent of that amount.

Other support measures could include providing information to employers on legal provisions and how to comply with them, as well as practical advice to replace employees on parental leave and accompanying their return to work. Other tips may relate to innovative work practices with new parents and their work teams.

Employers 'and workers' organizations also have a decisive role to play in informing their members of their rights and responsibilities, offering them training, disseminating good practices and measuring their productivity gains.

Zero cost and high profits

The ILO study shows that some maternity protection measures can be implemented at modest or no cost. Encouraging breastfeeding at work is a good example of a "win-win" scheme for both employers and workers. SMEs can derive direct benefits through increased staff retention and commitment from staff, and indirectly through the clearly established benefits of breastfeeding for the health of women and their children.

Finally, the report stresses the need for more quality research on the effects of maternity protection schemes in SMEs, especially in developing countries where a large number of SMEs operate in the informal economy and where the majority of women have no maternity protection.

However, maternity benefits are also limited in high-income countries. This is partly because more and more workers have part-time, casual or temporary work contracts and are therefore less likely to be eligible for maternity rights. In addition, there is increasing evidence of discrimination related to pregnancy and maternity, particularly when many companies are fighting for survival in times of economic slowdown.

The study's recommendations aim to reduce the disadvantages of motherhood so that women like Noemi, wherever they are in the world, can become mothers while preserving their livelihoods, dignity and ability. to provide for their families.

New management against ILO / ILO guidelines ... CQFD!

But hey, since we know that Fa (r) cebook is / was acoquiné with the CIA for having fomented all the troubles during the "Arab Spring", which will give the birth of Dash (monster with two heads no less fanatic What about the Black Waters? Hey weird, nobody talks about it anymore ... They were indeed in Iraq ... These diplomats are stupid, no follow-up in the ideas, no more than the journalists ...) in short, nothing more amazes us ...

I wonder what would happen, if a "foreign social network" were to set up in the States on a large scale and start to disturb public and political order, then to destabilize the social structure of the whole society up to to provoke a civil war ...!? Watch out for the Yankee's, it's not what I wish you, but after Snowden and Assange, it might come to you "inside"and the Black Panters as much as 9/11 would then only be seen as"good memories of the good old days" in comparison.