Censorship on twitter, facebook, youtube... Fed up!

[Obamot]

The last two points of the DSA, it's policing by bots, algorithms and integrated humanoids...

And the problem is that alternative platforms, like:
— Odyssey,
—Rumble
—Twitch
—Vk,
—Telegram

They will be forced to do it...
On the other hand, for platforms not domiciled in the EU, I do not see how they could do it, it will be interference, right?

You have to become a mod... that way you let what you want flow

[Obamot]

Black day against freedom of expression: it does not happen in Moscow!
London authorizes Assange's extradition to the United States

The banana republics of the info are not done trying to deprive people of freedom of expression.

Source: TV5 World

It's a "dark day" for his supporters but "not the end of the road": the British government announced on Friday that it had signed the decree for the extradition to the United States of the founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, who will appeal .

The 50-year-old Australian is being prosecuted in the United States, where he faces 175 years in prison for a massive leak of confidential documents.

After a long legal standoff with twists and turns, British justice had formally given the green light on April 20 to his surrender to American justice, but it was up to British Interior Minister Priti Patel to sign an extradition decree. , which she did on Friday.

"We are not at the end of the road. We are going to fight. We are going to use all the means of recourse", reacted Stella Assange, the wife of the Australian, during a press conference.

Visibly moved, she explained that her husband wanted to "fight" but mentioned a risk of suicide. "If he is extradited to the United States, the conditions in which he will find himself will be oppressive (...) It will push him to commit suicide."

At his side, lawyer Jennifer Robinson, who defends Julian Assange, confirmed that he would appeal to British justice within 14 days "and if necessary to the European Court of Human Rights".

The British Home Office validated the extradition of Julian Assange by considering that it was not "incompatible with his human rights, including his right to a fair trial and freedom of expression", underlining that in the United States, the Australian would be "treated appropriately, including with regard to his health".

Press freedom organizations oppose this extradition, fearing that despite the assurances of the American authorities, Julian Assange will be subjected to conditions of solitary confinement in prison which would aggravate a risk of suicide.

For Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International, the extradition of Julian Assange "would send a frightening message to journalists around the world".

Suite: https://information.tv5monde.com/info/l ... pel-460931

[Christophe]

[Christophe]

This is an admission of guilt of the grand conspiracy!

[Obamot]

There's no longer any need for Assange, it smacks in the face without shame...!

[izentrop]

[Obamot]

For gossip you can count on Izy-ment: you are talking about a source, relayed by “TheRealZeRoY" GAMER

And now suspicion of fraud, a scam complaint has been filed:

2AC09BF6-ED2E-48AB-894D-BB9734C178F7.jpeg (162.07 Kio) Consulté 523 fois

Oh wow “It's yours" this famous show of the granny at home, who knows how to turn her jacket around...

Who for 2 years claimed that covid was of natural origin, not so sure now:

Anyway, Izy-ment, after "Current wife" definitely goes from one rag to another...

[Obamot]

PS: and given the assiduity you put into fighting the HCQ with fake news Izentrop — partisan assiduity for obscure reasons since without ever publishing contradictory opinions / sources, I specify — what in fact is propaganda, I wonder if we can not assimilate that “to a harmful activity which would aim to force people into other paths (even more marginal, which would be contrary to your objective)” and above all to dissuade them from trying to treat themselves or protect themselves (since the act of care “or self-care” requires an effort) and therefore from the over-representation of contrary opinions (not justified by any emergency worthy of protection) we can undoubtedly identify a pathological aspect of your personal approach (admittedly made up of cynicism and provocation, which validates the validity of the analysis), but above all ask yourself if there is not a harmful or even repressive aspect in your behavior.

You should therefore stop all useless and parasitic focusing in the debate, which is certainly not beneficial to the plurality of expressions, and certainly not for you on the mental level either.

[Janic]

obamot

You should therefore stop all useless and parasitic focusing in the debate, which is certainly not beneficial to the plurality of expressions, and certainly not for you on the mental level either.

vain hope! It would be like asking a Nazi to give up his belief!

[Obamot]

HCQ [bla-bla-bla Continual Bashing]

You should therefore stop all useless and parasitic focusing in the debate, which is certainly not beneficial to the plurality of expressions, and certainly not for you on the mental level either.

vain hope! It would be like asking a Nazi to give up his belief!

Yes, but then he must know that no one is fooled by his nuisances, or he must deny it if it is not deliberate.

I note in passing that participation in the forum seems to be significantly increasing in inverse proportion to the scarcity of participation by those who have harmful behavior (and who have been reframed...)