No but frankly I really wonder if you can read ... sincerely
Already as members of forum you already had all the information since August 17 since most of the article has already appeared here.
health-pollution-prevention / resignation-of-dr-raoult-supporter-of-chloroquine-from-scientific-advice-covid19-t16370-4070.htmlSo not only did you not read the initial post but you also didn't read the article either.
In v'la of "in vitro" in v'la
The
Covid patients .... health workers
maybe it's in vitro
Government sources said the decision to replace hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with ivermectin was made after encouraging results in Agra, where it was used on an experimental basis.
Sources said the drug has been shown to be effective not only in treating Covid-19 patients, but also in preventing large-scale infections among frontline health workers engaged in the treatment and handling of patients. Covid-19.
In addition in the very first lines of the article and in the post we tell you that the summary of the whole story appears in this link.
Ivermectin Breaking into American News as Doctors Come Forward & Share Treatments for COVID-19But of course it's too tiring to open it.
I had of course quoted it myself, taking the precaution of specifying that the links allowed you to know more ... but hey, when it comes to doing in the superficial we have world champions especially in end of the night...
So you just had to click on one of these very informative links ... (bad word I think at this late hour) to find AGAIN on
izentrop wrote:a review of in vitro studies
well I was going to tell you
Broward Health Observational Study: Ivermectin is Associated with Lower Mortality for COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients280 patients
maybe it's petri dishes?
And I'm just citing two ... of your carnival in vitro ... but if you search well you will still find lots of other patients.
Wonder if you would not have confused a little in vivo and in vino tonight?
Go to yours
and next time put on the glasses