izentrop wrote:No, the moderation of fessebouc does not make the difference between denouncing fake news and disseminating it.
Who do you answer, to what ???
izentrop wrote:No, the moderation of fessebouc does not make the difference between denouncing fake news and disseminating it.
Still in “The CONS of the covid” mode, you confuse 'sanctions' and CENSORSHIP.izentrop wrote:In the article they speak of a guest, always the same, a specialist especially in "fake news".VetusLignum wrote:by guests who question the relevance of vaccines against Covid or the dangerousness of the virus. [/ b]
https://francais.rt.com/france/85501-ch ... opos-covid
https://www.capital.fr/entreprises-marc ... be-1399591
In this case sanction is normal. On the other hand, that “fake news” decryption groups are also threatened, it is less so.
to janic electricity-electronic-informatique / censorship-covid-de-facebook-youtube-ras-le-bol-t16530-150.html # p441354GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:Who do you answer, to what ???izentrop wrote:No, the moderation of fessebouc does not make the difference between denouncing fake news and disseminating it.
izentrop wrote:to janic electricity-electronic-informatique / censorship-covid-de-facebook-youtube-ras-le-bol-t16530-150.html # p441354GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:Who do you answer, to what ???izentrop wrote:No, the moderation of fessebouc does not make the difference between denouncing fake news and disseminating it.
it is not a question of fessebouc, but of the alleged antifakes which lay it! not easy to sort!Who do you answer, to what ???
to janic
Christophe wrote:AIE Aie Aie...
Let them come here !!
It's been several times, but they recreate their platform each time.VetusLignum wrote:Louis Fouché censored on Discord
FranceSoir lost a round in its battle against Google and its subsidiary YouTube.
On June 2, the Paris Commercial Court dismissed the website, as noted by BFM TV. The heir to the prestigious daily created at the Liberation demanded the restoration of his YouTube channel, the resumption of its referencing in Google News, as well as damages of at least 1,5 million euros.
The consular judges rejected these requests for procedural reasons. Indeed, FranceSoir asked them to rule on the matter urgently. But the court ruled that it could not rule urgently, given "disagreements between the parties" and that "FranceSoir did not provide financial evidence to demonstrate the existence of imminent damage". https://www.capital.fr/entreprises-marc ... le-1406152
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 148 guests