izentrop wrote:Yeah! Well, the report, hello
It seems to me just more nuanced than what the media in 25 lines or 1mn of video. Okay, there are 45 pages.
izentrop wrote:Yeah! Well, the report, hello
I had to deal with ENEDIS recently, following 3 power cuts the same day, concerning the whole village. I called the breakdown service to hear "But sir, please contact your electricity supplier". I stayed with my question.This deferral is therefore an advance made by Enedis, reimbursed
by consumers from 2021. The interest rate of this advance
is 4,6% and the interest amounts to 785 M € in total over the period 2015-
2030, that is on average 49 M € per year.
The deferred financing is carried out for the first
(3 million counters), from Enedis own funds and, for the second
tranche (31 million meters), in particular through an intra-group loan
rate of 0,77% backed by European Bank financing
Investment Bank (EIB). Enedis therefore benefits from a differential of
remuneration of 3,83%, for the part financed by the intragroup loan. In
assuming that 10% of the total deferred amount is financed from
equity and that the supplement is financed by borrowing at the rate of
0,77%, the average cost of the deferred would be for Enedis of 1,8%, ie a
margin 2,8% corresponding to an additional cost for users of 506 M € in
current euros and 464 M € 2014 in constant euros over the period
2014-2031. https://www.ccomptes.fr/sites/default/f ... Tome-1.pdf 13 page
No, the economic logic is to have complete areas in which we can completely remove the meter reading tour.izentrop wrote:Yes, no economic logic in this forced replacement.
The logic would have been to replace the oldest disc counters first. As they call the client before intervention, it is enough that they ask the question if it is not informed in their databases, which would be surprising.
Anyway, the user does not have much to gain with Linky ...izentrop wrote:Yes for the ENEDIS logic, but does the user have to win?
izentrop wrote:Or did you see that linky communicate with each other?
250 page of the Court of Auditors' report wrote :The communicating meters relaying the information transmitted by the other communicating meters, it is necessary that the rate of communicating meters connected to a transformer is sufficient (70% minimum)
Until then, whether at Enedis or CRE http://www.cre.fr/reseaux/reseaux-intel ... ge-evoluesthere is talk of communication with the local hub, not between them.Gaston wrote:izentrop wrote:Or did you see that linky communicate with each other?250 page of the Court of Auditors' report wrote :The communicating meters relaying the information transmitted by the other communicating meters, it is necessary that the rate of communicating meters connected to a transformer is sufficient (70% minimum)
Gaston wrote:Anyway, the user does not have much to gain with Linky ...
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 191 guests