computer consumption is another debate mine (portable) making 22,03 W / h
I am interested in firing the modem which is one of my main energy consumers per month
Low Power Modem?
-
- I understand econologic
- posts: 148
- Registration: 17/11/08, 11:54
- coucou789456
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 1019
- Registration: 22/08/08, 05:15
- Location: Narbonne
Hello again
possibility to deactivate peripherals not used in the computer, such as internal modem for example, sound card, network card ..... anything that is useless
deactivation in the bios because otherwise it is useless to deactivate it only in windows
jeff
ps: if there is a 56k modem in the computer, it is better to remove it, it is more radical than disabling it
if there is a possibility of reducing the speed of operation of the processor, one can still gain a few milliamps on the conco
possibility to deactivate peripherals not used in the computer, such as internal modem for example, sound card, network card ..... anything that is useless
deactivation in the bios because otherwise it is useless to deactivate it only in windows
jeff
ps: if there is a 56k modem in the computer, it is better to remove it, it is more radical than disabling it
if there is a possibility of reducing the speed of operation of the processor, one can still gain a few milliamps on the conco
0 x
-
- I understand econologic
- posts: 148
- Registration: 17/11/08, 11:54
coucou789456 wrote:on the other hand, it is not by seeing Alizée that I am going to start to bandage (let us use the good expressions) ... it is not a person transcendent at this point there.
Uh me neither, it was just to make a little humor, because every time I see your avatar, it causes me to laugh
0 x
- coucou789456
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 1019
- Registration: 22/08/08, 05:15
- Location: Narbonne
Hello again
that's a little better ----> http://www.info-utiles.fr/modules/news/ ... toryid=966
or even better ----> http://crawlers.fr/acces_/forum_/viewto ... 47&p=31179
(click only once on the empty frames)
jeff
nlc wrote:..............
Uh me either, it was just to make a little humor, because every time I see your avatar, it causes me to laugh: lol:
that's a little better ----> http://www.info-utiles.fr/modules/news/ ... toryid=966
or even better ----> http://crawlers.fr/acces_/forum_/viewto ... 47&p=31179
(click only once on the empty frames)
jeff
0 x
-
- I understand econologic
- posts: 148
- Registration: 17/11/08, 11:54
after 2 days and 19 h of operation of the answering machine the result is:
consumption: 0,13 W / h
let's admit (abusive) operation 24 hours a day over 365 days that makes me: 1138,8 Wh / year = 1,139 KWh / year
I add them to my previous calculation:
1,139 (answering machine) + 7,3 (modem) = 8,44 KWh / year
in comparison to the new modem put on the market and which make internet + such there is no photo.
my consumption with my modem makes me a consumption of 50,57KWh / year
with the recommended change without change of "comfort" the difference is:
50,57 - 8,44 = 42,13 KWh / year
which is huge, not to mention the fact that the answering machine will not be systematically switched on.
Only problem in history (with financial reasoning) the price of the phone on one side (€ 12,90 / month + subscription) and the internet on the other is much more expensive (even with the difference in consumption) that all inclusive (tel + internet):
conclusion: we are not trying to make us lower the electricity bill ... but that we already knew ...
consumption: 0,13 W / h
let's admit (abusive) operation 24 hours a day over 365 days that makes me: 1138,8 Wh / year = 1,139 KWh / year
I add them to my previous calculation:
1,139 (answering machine) + 7,3 (modem) = 8,44 KWh / year
in comparison to the new modem put on the market and which make internet + such there is no photo.
my consumption with my modem makes me a consumption of 50,57KWh / year
with the recommended change without change of "comfort" the difference is:
50,57 - 8,44 = 42,13 KWh / year
which is huge, not to mention the fact that the answering machine will not be systematically switched on.
Only problem in history (with financial reasoning) the price of the phone on one side (€ 12,90 / month + subscription) and the internet on the other is much more expensive (even with the difference in consumption) that all inclusive (tel + internet):
conclusion: we are not trying to make us lower the electricity bill ... but that we already knew ...
0 x
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 259 guests