Fraud and manipulation of political opinion on Twitter and social networks

Hi-tech electronic and computer equipment and Internet. Better use of electricity, help with the work and specifications, equipment selection. Presentations fixtures and plans. Waves and electromagnetic pollution.
User avatar
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 62117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 3371

Fraud and manipulation of political opinion on Twitter and social networks




by Christophe » 16/07/21, 13:42

We already knew that social networks were used for political manipulation ... but that by "ugly" Russia ... but with us no no not everything is obviously "clean"!

We already knew they were practicing censorship on social networks of information too far from the establishment especially in the covid crisis ... and that this'censorship had been officially prepared by Europe

We already knew that Social networks did not respect your privacy

We already knew that social networks were selling and exchanging your personal information to better track you!

We already knew that their algo was corrupted by the establishment: according to your information, you are more or less relayed ...

So despite their name, social networks have therefore become a real social danger, there is strictly nothing social about it anymore ... except that it is you who work voluntarily to make their greatness! This is the socialism of social networks! : Cheesy:

Today a notch has gone up in France in the abuse of social networks ...on Twitter on a poll of the Patriots, I think we are dealing with a proven case of fraud in the manipulation of opinion on compulsory vaccination and the health pass.

I think the government sent an army of bots or trolls to distort this poll initiated by Les Patriotes and Phillipot: @_LesPatriotes @f_philippot



The likes ratio proves obvious fraud on this poll! I'll let some of you who like numbers go through them in more detail ...It will be particularly interesting to have the% of pro pass vote within 18 hours of the end of the survey... (if anyone has other intermediate captures, that might help..Obamot maybe?)

The question is whether governments have rights directly to twitter administrators or if this goes through fraudulent social methods (farm bot, paid users in India, China or Africa ...) well known for 10 years and that twitter does not fight against at all!

Rotten.png
Pourris.png (338.49 KiB) Viewed 629 times


This is happening in France and before our eyes!
It always helps to take screenshots!

I posted on Twitter:

1 x

User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 18473
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 2030

Re: Fraud and manipulation of political opinion on Twitter and social networks




by Obamot » 16/07/21, 13:50

Christophe wrote:
Christophe wrote:Cheating and cheating are now the day-to-day methods of the buffoon government.


Here it is:


It is rare to be able to be categorical, but in this case it seems that it is possible to VERY easily respond with a:

“YES” there was a manipulation!


Proof by the simple statistical law of “standard deviations” itself (on Gaussian curve, as everyone should know ...)
=> square root of the variance or, equivalently, the root mean square of the deviations from the mean.

1) a strong starting trend> 90% of “yes” VS <10% on a small sample, is all the more difficult to reverse.

2) a standard deviation out of 500 votes was a first confirmation that was already quite significant.

3) a standard deviation over 1 was excellent (still 000/90) then over 10 was perfect.

4) From there, a standard deviation out of 5 and then 000 (still 8/000) gave an almost exact picture of the trend!

I no longer remember the exact figures, but to reverse a previous trend such as in (4) of 8 votes, I believe that it takes nearly 000 votes ... then going to millions of votes ... So such a turnaround could only have been very gradual, and on a 100x higher number of votes ...

The unbearable side is that the alleged “clean hands”Of GAFAM, who want to“ clean up the web of “fakes news”” With their algorithms, in fact created the conditions for bot fraud!
1 x
Fans-Club of “funny”: ABC2019, Izentrop, Sicetaitsimple (known as Kiki), Pedrodelavega (Ex PB2488).
Rajqawee
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 946
Registration: 27/02/20, 09:21
Location: Occitania
x 345

Re: Fraud and manipulation of political opinion on Twitter and social networks




by Rajqawee » 16/07/21, 14:15

Here, gift:

Image
1 x
User avatar
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 62117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 3371

Re: Fraud and manipulation of political opinion on Twitter and social networks




by Christophe » 16/07/21, 14:32

Nothing to add Obamot, well spoken ... 8) 8) 8)

Here is the calculation of the last 18 hours:

At 5 a.m.: 5773 votes divided into 0.89 * 5773 = 5138 voters AGAINST THE PASS
and 0.11 * 5573 = 635 FOR THE PASS

At the end: 8428 voters AGAINST THE PASS
19 854 FOR THE PASS

Voting during the 18 hours between these 2 captures: 22 voters
3 AGAINST THE PASS
19 219 FOR THE PASS

The proportion during the last 18 hours is therefore 14.6% AGAINST AND 85.4% FOR

A bit big...

It would be very interesting to have intermediate data ... an evolution curve of the votes ideally but only the admin of Twitter can have it! Or at a pinch the Patriots?

And if they have them, it will make them an EXCELLENT electoral weapon against the villainous propaganda methods used by the current government !!

Edit: ah damn Raj, I was writing at the same time ... in short, the reasoning is the same, it's great, anything for democracy!
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 18473
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 2030

Re: Fraud and manipulation of political opinion on Twitter and social networks




by Obamot » 16/07/21, 14:36

Well yes, if it helps, it gives this:

55732 = 33'327'529

But how did they manage to reverse the trend with only 28 votes when it would take millions?

As an example, we already had this, with ten times fewer votes:

_5002 = 250'000

So without being too wrong, it's impossible!
Last edited by Obamot the 16 / 07 / 21, 14: 37, 1 edited once.
0 x
Fans-Club of “funny”: ABC2019, Izentrop, Sicetaitsimple (known as Kiki), Pedrodelavega (Ex PB2488).

User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 10289
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 1303

Re: Fraud and manipulation of political opinion on Twitter and social networks




by Remundo » 16/07/21, 14:37

not very complicated to understand

a team of electronic voting robots, which can also mingle with militant voting humans, flooded the poll with conflicting votes.

it is no coincidence that Macronescu wants to set up electronic voting in the next presidential elections.
0 x
ImageImageImage
Rajqawee
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 946
Registration: 27/02/20, 09:21
Location: Occitania
x 345

Re: Fraud and manipulation of political opinion on Twitter and social networks




by Rajqawee » 16/07/21, 14:48

Let's be careful though. This is not impossible, even without electronic "fraud".

the figures remain small, at the scale of the RS. Philippot has a little visibility, but it suffices that it has been shared on an FB page or a high-visibility twitter, acquired by a population favorable to measures to obtain the 28kvotes with a completely reversed trend.

It would be "bad luck" to have had visibility only with this small piece of Internet very oriented (conversely), but not impossible despite everything.
1 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6174
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 1638

Re: Fraud and manipulation of political opinion on Twitter and social networks




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 16/07/21, 15:10

Rajqawee wrote:RS. Philippot has some visibility

The people who answer don't give a damn about Philippot, it's the questions that interest them.
0 x
"It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on smart things. The most serious disease of the brain is to think." (J. Rouxel)
"No ?" ©
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect" .... "There is absolutely nothing to do about the climate" .... "Nature is shit". (Exnihiloest, aka Blédina)
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 18473
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 2030

Re: Fraud and manipulation of political opinion on Twitter and social networks




by Obamot » 16/07/21, 15:15

Christophe wrote:Nothing to add Obamot, well spoken ... 8) 8) 8)

Here is the calculation of the last 18 hours:

At 5 a.m.: 5773 votes divided into 0.89 * 5773 = 5138 voters AGAINST THE PASS
and 0.11 * 5573 = 635 FOR THE PASS

At the end: 8428 voters AGAINST THE PASS
19 854 FOR THE PASS

Voting during the 18 hours between these 2 captures: 22 voters
3 AGAINST THE PASS
19 219 FOR THE PASS

The proportion during the last 18 hours is therefore 14.6% AGAINST AND 85.4% FOR

A bit big...

It would be very interesting to have intermediate data ... an evolution curve of the votes ideally but only the admin of Twitter can have it! Or at a pinch the Patriots?

And if they have them, it will make them an EXCELLENT electoral weapon against the villainous propaganda methods used by the current government !!

Edit: ah damn Raja I was writing at the same time ... in short, the reasoning is the same, it's great, anything for democracy!
Yes, yes, we may have the elements to make a projection ...

- Around 90 votes, we were at approx. 91% VS 9%
- Around 500 votes, we had gained in precision with approx. 90% VS 10%
- With 5773 votes, accuracy: even better of 89% VS 11%… and sustained trend!
- Possible top of the Gaussian curve with null variant at 33 mios :!: :?: ( : Cheesy: : Oops: )

We have all the elements we need, don't we?

Who can model that as a Gaussian curve, with a realistic estimate of 28 votes? Just to see the magnitude of “the botique scam”, For want of being gothic, I still don't have a software with a pretty statistical Gaussian curve (on my tablet : Mrgreen: )
0 x
Fans-Club of “funny”: ABC2019, Izentrop, Sicetaitsimple (known as Kiki), Pedrodelavega (Ex PB2488).
User avatar
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 62117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 3371

Re: Fraud and manipulation of political opinion on Twitter and social networks




by Christophe » 16/07/21, 15:31

Obamot wrote:Well yes, if it helps, it gives this:

55732 = 33'327'529

But how did they manage to reverse the trend with only 28 votes when it would take millions?

As an example, we already had this, with ten times fewer votes:

_5002 = 250'000

So without being too wrong, it's impossible!


I didn't understand anything ... my probabilities lessons are far away ... can you develop?
0 x


 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Electricity, electronics and computers: Hi-tech, Internet, DIY, lighting, materials, and new"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 13 guests