Pension reform - you were born in 1960 (or after) you will work more

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

Wow mazette they made strong tonight the government ....

Whereas it was believed that only the generations according to 1975 would be impacted by the pension reform, it is well and truly generation from 1960 who is hit hard and will have to work more.

As for those who are born from 1967 they are "dead" the pivot age goes to 64 direct years for them

Tonight no one has caught this (as for the announcement of the rise of the smic post yellow vests that was not one) but TOMORROW I believe that thousands of French who thought themselves spared will wake up with the jaws of wood

As for the poor farmers (and others) who declared themselves satisfied with their 1000 € they will understand that their 200 € more they will earn them just by working 2 years more.

[sicetaitsimple]

Tonight nobody got it

I'm not sure I've followed everything, but ...
You can explain?

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

Tonight nobody got it

I'm not sure I've followed everything, but ...
You can explain?

Well, if you were born in 1960 you will be impacted.

Your pivot age will change to 62 years and 4 months.

If you were born in 1961 at 62 years and 8 months ....

If you were born in 1962 at 63 years

And so on until the new pivot age of 64 years that will be reached in 2027 for EVERYONE.

So happy? (Well, you may already be a lucky retiree, though)

[sicetaitsimple]

(Well, you may already be a lucky retiree, though)

Yes, I am ... Party to 62 pile ... Is this a reference? Not really sure ....

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

(Well, you may already be a lucky retiree, though)

Yes, I am ... Party to 62 pile ... Is this a reference? Not really sure ....

I do not know....

Those who leave in 2021 even those whose pivot age will be 62 years and 4 months will be a little spared.

From 62 years and 8 months it will start to damn add

What is surprising is that politically speaking (not to mention retirement in itself) it's really a club that no one expected.

64 years from 2027 had to dare

Curious to see what this will give in opinion

[sen-no-sen]

"Social is like cycling, it's easier to get off than to get on".

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

In the 1er post I put 1965 to go to 64 years and then I corrected and put 1967 but I stuffed it is good 1965

https://www.bfmtv.com/economie/retraite ... 22424.html

[moulino51]

Good evening,

I think the biggest bullshit is not to raise the legal retirement age, but to have lowered it, when it should have stayed at 65 when we knew well at that time that demography (baby boom) was going to put us straight into the wall.

The pay-as-you-go system is a real mess, at one point there is too much cash in the boxes (my father retired with more money than when he worked) and then there is no more enough.

And now we have to go back to the legal age (I'm not talking about special regimes) to manage to balance the accounts, which is almost impossible.

Good by the collapse we will have caught up



GS

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

Good evening,

I think the biggest bullshit is not to raise the legal retirement age, but to have lowered it, when it should have stayed at 65 when we knew well at that time that demography (baby boom) was going to put us straight into the wall.

The pay-as-you-go system is a real mess, at one point there is too much cash in the boxes (my father retired with more money than when he worked) and then there is no more enough.

And now we have to go back to the legal age (I'm not talking about special regimes) to manage to balance the accounts, which is almost impossible.

Good by the collapse we will have caught up



GS

How is funded retirement?

[perseus]

Hello,

The 64 will probably be there before 2027 and without the reform.
https://www.statistiques-recherches.cnav.fr/age-de-depart-a-la-retraite.html

@+