A solid wood house (it looks not eh?) Made of KLH panels resembling glued lamele:
A fairly complete summary document, especially with the summer / winter / mid-season thermal phase shift curves: https://www.econologie.com/photos-et-per ... -4212.html
Presentation of a low energy house in solid wood KLH
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79126
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10974
Presentation of a low energy house in solid wood KLH
Last edited by Christophe the 20 / 01 / 10, 11: 35, 1 edited once.
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
Interesting document!
Lignatec KLH is a Vosges company that sells wood panels of the Austrian company KLH http://www.klh.at/produkt-brettsperrholz-klh.html?L=4. The study of a house is made by their design office which then places an order with KLH Austria> direct delivery to the site (just the framework, not the insulation).
For the price, ask for a study.
See also:
http://www.maisoneco.com/spip.php?article69
http://maisoneco.over-blog.com/
Lignatec KLH is a Vosges company that sells wood panels of the Austrian company KLH http://www.klh.at/produkt-brettsperrholz-klh.html?L=4. The study of a house is made by their design office which then places an order with KLH Austria> direct delivery to the site (just the framework, not the insulation).
For the price, ask for a study.
See also:
http://www.maisoneco.com/spip.php?article69
http://maisoneco.over-blog.com/
Last edited by bham the 15 / 12 / 09, 10: 41, 1 edited once.
0 x
If the photo was taken at noon, I already see serious design flaws.
The decorative south-facing "gable" has no awning traditionally used to prevent the sun from hitting the windows to the south.
This same "pinion" generates shade at the end of the day on the photovoltaic panels and CONSIDERABLY degrades their performance. Remember that only one panel in the shade and the whole thong is no longer producing.
Otherwise the large slope of the roof is ideal for solar capture (zenith angle near the 90 ° for a large part of the year).
The decorative south-facing "gable" has no awning traditionally used to prevent the sun from hitting the windows to the south.
This same "pinion" generates shade at the end of the day on the photovoltaic panels and CONSIDERABLY degrades their performance. Remember that only one panel in the shade and the whole thong is no longer producing.
Otherwise the large slope of the roof is ideal for solar capture (zenith angle near the 90 ° for a large part of the year).
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79126
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10974
Well I think I found the 1ere quality (default?) Of all econologists:
WE ARE CRITICAL GROWERS AND WE ARE NEVER SATISFIED!
Well, maybe that's the ambition (of a better habitat)?
According to this link, it is not so cheap as that, 199 000 € for F2:
http://www.lamaisondedemain.com/index2. ... 5-a_vendre
So good performance thanks to wood: yes but for how long? I agree a little boubka on this point so ...
For me, this kind of "pre-assembled" wooden construction compared to a hard masonry should be 30 to 40% less expensive per m² at equivalent thermal performance ...
WE ARE CRITICAL GROWERS AND WE ARE NEVER SATISFIED!
Well, maybe that's the ambition (of a better habitat)?
bham wrote:For the price, ask for a study.
According to this link, it is not so cheap as that, 199 000 € for F2:
http://www.lamaisondedemain.com/index2. ... 5-a_vendre
So good performance thanks to wood: yes but for how long? I agree a little boubka on this point so ...
For me, this kind of "pre-assembled" wooden construction compared to a hard masonry should be 30 to 40% less expensive per m² at equivalent thermal performance ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
It is true.Christophe wrote:Well I think I found the 1ere quality (default?) Of all econologists:
WE ARE CRITICAL GROWERS AND WE ARE NEVER SATISFIED!
Well, maybe that's the ambition (of a better habitat)?
After a detailed examination of the document ... it is still VERY WELL.
I am surprised for the surface of the photovoltaic generator; 36m² is a lot, it surely exceeds the 3 kWc.
I maintain that shading management should have been treated differently. I, for my part, asked for the realization of a single field of PV in the upper part of the roof, that devoid of shading. I could have placed the thermal panels under the PV which would not have much impact on the production of solar hot water. At the examination of my own production, also in planar sensors, I notice that the solar pumping stops as soon as the sun declines whereas in photovoltaic one can continue to produce ...
0 x
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 85 guests