Law Loppsi 2 against light habitat type Yurt?

[Christophe]

December 14 will pass the law loppsi 2 ...

Living in trucks, yurts, teepees, trailers, cabins will become illegal! A letter will be sent to all mayors and Prefects who will be liable to a fine of € 3 in the event of non-DENUNCIATION !!! Our habitats can be destroyed within 700 hours !!

This law will pass because no one has heard of it !!
sign the petition:
http://www.petitionenligne.fr/petition/ ... ppsi-2/398


LOPPSI 2, The Government is waging war on the underprivileged:

No to the criminalization and arbitrary expulsion of residents of makeshift housing ...
ROMs, Travelers, slum dwellers, huts, houses without building permits, and all forms of light, mobile and ephemeral housing, all are targeted ...
At a time when the Government is under attack from all sides on its repressive and racist policy towards the Roma, Travelers and, as a rule, precarious populations, it has forcefully adopted Article 32 ter A of LOPSSI 2 against inhabitants of slums, makeshift dwellings, homeless camps like in the Bois de Vincennes, and also against people who have chosen to live in caravans, caravans, trucks, teepees , yurts, cars and eco-constructions.

Any construction without a building permit, as there are many in the French overseas departments and territories, could also fall under the scope of this exception procedure, because a building without a permit is "illegal". This procedure also threatens squatters: the Ministry of the Interior announced its intention to extend it to occupants of premises during the second reading in the National Assembly.

Article 32 ter A of the LOPPSI 2 is an exceptional measure because it flouts the principles of protection by the judge of the home, property, family and private life, and gives an arbitrary and disproportionate power to the Prefect: indeed, the eviction procedure currently in force on makeshift accommodation requires a decision from the judge, it protects against eviction in winter, it allows to be taken into account in rehousing or even accommodation schemes, it must respect deadlines and procedural documents issued by a bailiff, it provides for the protection of the property of evicted persons ....

It is an arbitrary measure because it is justified by "a serious risk of damage to public health, public safety and tranquility", extensible and vague concepts which leave room for all interpretations. It targets anyone who has decided in a meeting (2 or more people) to settle on land regardless of the owner, and the nature of the relationship between the owner of the land and the inhabitants. Even if one of the inhabitants is the owner of the land, or if the use of the land is contracted with the occupants, or if the owner is simply not opposed to this installation, the Prefect can use this exception procedure within a period 48 hours.

The article provides for a financial penalty for those who do not execute quickly enough, as well as the destruction of the house and the property it contains, on accelerated procedure. Bulldozer destruction and theft of other people's property will thus be legalized. This provision opens the way to an infringement of property rights.

This law would facilitate the authoritarian destruction of so-called “illegal” constructions, and the carrying out of the “anti-banization fight” launched in particular by the Prefect of the Pyrenees Orientales since 2007.

This provision targets and overwhelms the people most seriously affected by the housing crisis. In contrast to the policies implemented 50 years ago, it responds to the resurgence of slums and the most acute forms of poor housing through repression and an expeditious eviction procedure. Indeed, while the Government claims to implement the right to housing, there is no provision for rehousing or accommodation for the evicted. They must leave the premises and make themselves invisible.

We request the withdrawal of this article, the return and compliance with the original law on the reception grounds, adopted in 2000 as part of the SRU law, and legislative measures which recognize the quality of domicile and its character. permanent to the chosen habitat, instead of repressing and stigmatizing it.

We demand that the policy of resorption of shantytowns and makeshift habitats is part of housing policies, the implementation of the DALO law and unsanitary procedures, ... so that everyone can be housed with dignity .

We denounce the repressive and stigmatizing policy of the Government which attacks the most modest and the most fragile, and demand the abandonment of any anti-squat project.

First signatories: ACDL, ADGVE, AITEC, AFVS, AMIDT, ANGVC, CGT CDC, Cheyenne, CNL, DAL, FAPIL, Fédération Calé / Kalé, FNASAT, HALEM, Black Thursday, The voice of the Roma, LDH, MRAP, RESOCI, SAF , Union Syndicale Solidaire, Selected Life and Habitat, ... As well as: Alternative, PG, NPA, Les Verts, ...

__________________________________________________

The articles to be voted on December 14:
http://www.droitaulogement.org/loi-lopp ... ter-a.html
________________________________________________________________

PRESS REVIEW: La Quadrature du Net

La Quadrature du Net is an organization defending the rights and freedoms of citizens on the Internet. It promotes an adaptation of French and European legislation which is faithful to the values ​​which have governed the development of the Internet, in particular the free circulation of knowledge. As such, La Quadrature du Net intervenes in particular in debates concerning freedom of expression, copyright, regulation of the telecommunications sector and respect for privacy. It provides interested citizens with tools enabling them to better understand legislative processes in order to intervene effectively in public debate.
http://www.laquadrature.net/fr/filtrage-du-net
Loppsi 2: "The dictators dreamed of it, Sarkozy did it":
http://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/societ ... 17757.html

Loppsi 2 bill on the Internet: Filtering, filing and hacking on all floors:
http://www.acrimed.org/article3289.html

[Christophe]

A first reaction in a mesh:

Afterwards, the nurses are prohibited from taking blood samples. This work will be reserved for 1 or 2 laboratories per department, which will have to be equipped with very expensive and very sophisticated equipment and few staff. Labs which can be directed by financiers and no longer by a biologist doctor! .. Most of the small labs in France are currently bought by financial groups (the windfall is substantial) .... After ... After ... What who awaits us AFTER? ... Each and every one of us may be hit the next blow ... We are governed by unfair people in the pay of financiers ...
The beautiful principles of the French Republic LIBERTE, EQUALITE, FRATERNITE, are being flouted! ...: - ((
The measures which are taken by the government-and-ment, in chain and without any concertation, are all in the direction of the suppression of the individual freedoms ... WE ARE NO LONGER IN DEMOCRACY.

Pass on the information and react while we can still do it!

And 1 letter to send to parliamentarians: https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... JYMsbb.pdf

[tigrou_838]

hello, and in addition I just read something that is not going to please a lot of people, look at this:

"" "" LOPSSI 2 against the inhabitants of slums, makeshift dwellings, homeless camps such as in the Bois de Vincennes, and also against people who have chosen to live in caravans, trailers, trucks, teepees, yurts, cars and eco-constructions. "" ""

so even auto and eco-constructions are in the crosshairs, and reading well, even with the right authorizations, it is not going well, even more people outside with winter and already a lot of homeless.

this law is anything.

tigrou

[renaud67]

But where are we going
cf. Metronom ': Zero tolerance (bd)

[dedeleco]

When will the law get rid of the poorly housed poor, homeless or outsized uluberlus ????? by sending them back to Romania illico !!!

Like that there will remain only the rich paying the ISF and the well thinking in France !!

[tigrou_838]

hi, why in romania i know a lot of english ulluberlu who live in yurts.

so all the foreigners outside, even the well-meaning.

and for isf, it costs more to the state than what it brings back.

and in addition the fortunes preferred to leave the country.

it's really all that nonsense. it's even less than zero tolerance.

I would rather say that the people who lay this kind of thing are less than zero.

Freedom, I don't know where it is.
equality, is that still part of the dictionary ??
brotherhood, fair to bling bling people.

[Christophe]

When will the law get rid of the poorly housed poor, homeless or outsized uluberlus ?????

Well, isn't that the one?

[dirk pitt]

"" "" LOPSSI 2 against the inhabitants of slums, makeshift dwellings, homeless camps such as in the Bois de Vincennes, and also against people who have chosen to live in caravans, trailers, trucks, teepees, yurts, self and eco-constructions. "" ""

tigrou

it would be interesting to know what is under these terms because I do not see the relationship with the other types of housing mentioned above.

[elephant]

Abbé Pierre! Where are you ? Come back with your mandate as deputy and your decorations!

[Alain G]

We are not lucky with Harper but your Sarko is very strong!


Here we fight with the homeless so that they sleep warm!

If the same law had to be passed in the USA, it would not pass because it is raining!