Opinion and test Hydrogen HHO kit feedback experience?

Buying well and choosing a product or service well means, in addition to being satisfied, consuming less and preserving the planet, it is essential in 2021 to buy better! Also the exchange of information and experiences makes it possible to avoid various scams and crooks. In 2021, it is essential to exchange your experiences of use, positive or negative, because the market for products and services for the consumer has never been so abundant in the history of mankind. Helping to choose better is essential because buying better means buying sustainable!
User avatar
Gaston
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1910
Registration: 04/10/10, 11:37
x 88




by Gaston » 07/07/14, 17:31

Shadow wrote:http://enault.christian.free.fr/sti2d/etape8/2/travail-rendement.pdf
Besides the fact that this link presents only very simple results, it has absolutely nothing to do with the question (which was, I would remind you to know if the addition of 0,01% of HHO significantly increased the engine efficiency) : Mrgreen:
0 x
The shadow
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 171
Registration: 13/04/08, 15:16
x 2




by The shadow » 07/07/14, 22:54

Simply starting is a guarantee of good results : Mrgreen:
http://www.hkmenergie-hho.com/infos-hho.php
0 x
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 07/07/14, 23:32

Shadow wrote:Simply starting is a guarantee of good results : Mrgreen:
http://www.hkmenergie-hho.com/infos-hho.php



Image


Your link is a collection of co ..... laughs, fortunately an engine burns more than 70% of its fuel .....

Take a look at this:

Image


Image
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
The shadow
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 171
Registration: 13/04/08, 15:16
x 2




by The shadow » 08/07/14, 14:52

theory and practice are very different I talk about an internal combustion engine
here is a pdf modeling
http://perso.univ-lemans.fr/~fcalvay/mn ... ustion.pdf
you will make me the pleasure of reading which is well marked that ALL the fuel does not burn must have the fuel = stoichiometric
I'm outside
0 x
User avatar
Gaston
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1910
Registration: 04/10/10, 11:37
x 88




by Gaston » 08/07/14, 15:49

Shadow wrote:you will make me the pleasure of reading which is well marked that ALL the fuel does not burn must have the fuel = stoichiometric
Which is precisely the role of the lambda probe 8)

But you keep moving away from the topic of improving combustion by adding HHO to admission.
0 x
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 08/07/14, 22:33

Shadow wrote:theory and practice are very different I talked about an internal combustion engine
here is a pdf modeling
http://perso.univ-lemans.fr/~fcalvay/mn ... ustion.pdf
you will make me happy to read which is well marked that ALL fuel does not burn fuel must be = stoichiometric
I'm outside


The link above also gives the results measured for an internal combustion engine (petrol) but the unburnt (HC) are also in very small proportions (nothing to do with the 30% unburned fuel suggested by your fanciful link).
So "ALL fuel does not burn" is + or - 30% : Mrgreen:
It is not the fuel which is stoichiometric but the chemical reaction / notion of proportion between oxidizing fuel.

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/St%C5%93chiom%C3%A9trie
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.

[Eugène Ionesco]

http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
User avatar
gildas
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 879
Registration: 05/03/10, 23:59
x 173

Re: HHO experience feedback kit?




by gildas » 23/08/17, 08:36

Hello,
Feedback on an HHO kit mounted on a boat. The results are ... impressive! More than 50% fuel savings at € 3,80 per liter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmY9uQS3e6I


I suspect the presence of water vapor with the HHO, the engine having been running for 24 hours.


--
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79001
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10933

Re: HHO experience feedback kit?




by Christophe » 23/08/17, 10:29

And another video a little more "scientific" (but we could do better than that...) which shows that the gain in consumption of the HHO system is nil (what we have said from the beginning here... given the homeopathic quantities of H2 produced by HHO)... if we do not correct (quite a lot) other parameters...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOJ_eW5HOOs

It's actually an American video (I guess saw the yellow band on the road) edited and commented in French...
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13625
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1499
Contact :

Re: HHO experience feedback kit?




by izentrop » 23/08/17, 14:01

54% savings, but go for it : Mrgreen:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79001
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10933

Re: HHO experience feedback kit?




by Christophe » 23/08/17, 19:14

In fact it's not already 54% savings ... 54% savings means reducing consumption by more than half ... this is not the case here ... otherwise it would mean that 'we double the MPG ...

24 MPG = 24 * 1,8 / 3,8 = 11,4 km / L or 8,8 L / 100km

36 MPG = 36 * 1,8 / 3,8 = 17 km / L or 5.8 L / 100km

The economy is therefore only 34% ... (if it is proven it is not bad ... but 5.8 L / 100 km ca is nothing miraculous on flat even for a large displacement)

And hop -1 in credibility : Cheesy:
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "Reviews and tests of products and services." Good deals, scams and scams. What to choose, reviews and purchase tests to choose better! "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 12 guests